mm,thp,rmap: lock_compound_mapcounts() on THP mapcounts
Fix the races in maintaining compound_mapcount, subpages_mapcount and subpage _mapcount by using PG_locked in the first tail of any compound page for a bit_spin_lock() on such modifications; skipping the usual atomic operations on those fields in this case. Bring page_remove_file_rmap() and page_remove_anon_compound_rmap() back into page_remove_rmap() itself. Rearrange page_add_anon_rmap() and page_add_file_rmap() and page_remove_rmap() to follow the same "if (compound) {lock} else if (PageCompound) {lock} else {atomic}" pattern (with a PageTransHuge in the compound test, like before, to avoid BUG_ONs and optimize away that block when THP is not configured). Move all the stats updates outside, after the bit_spin_locked section, so that it is sure to be a leaf lock. Add page_dup_compound_rmap() to manage compound locking versus atomics in sync with the rest. In particular, hugetlb pages are still using the atomics: to avoid unnecessary interference there, and because they never have subpage mappings; but this exception can easily be changed. Conveniently, page_dup_compound_rmap() turns out to suit an anon THP's __split_huge_pmd_locked() too. bit_spin_lock() is not popular with PREEMPT_RT folks: but PREEMPT_RT sensibly excludes TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE already, so its only exposure is to the non-hugetlb non-THP pte-mapped compound pages (with large folios being currently dependent on TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE). There is never any scan of subpages in this case; but we have chosen to use PageCompound tests rather than PageTransCompound tests to gate the use of lock_compound_mapcounts(), so that page_mapped() is correct on all compound pages, whether or not TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is enabled: could that be a problem for PREEMPT_RT, when there is contention on the lock - under heavy concurrent forking for example? If so, then it can be turned into a sleeping lock (like folio_lock()) when PREEMPT_RT. A simple 100 X munmap(mmap(2GB, MAP_SHARED|MAP_POPULATE, tmpfs), 2GB) took 18 seconds on small pages, and used to take 1 second on huge pages, but now takes 115 milliseconds on huge pages. Mapping by pmds a second time used to take 860ms and now takes 86ms; mapping by pmds after mapping by ptes (when the scan is needed) used to take 870ms and now takes 495ms. Mapping huge pages by ptes is largely unaffected but variable: between 5% faster and 5% slower in what I've recorded. Contention on the lock is likely to behave worse than contention on the atomics behaved. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1b42bd1a-8223-e827-602f-d466c2db7d3c@google.comSigned-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment