Commit 9cc17ede authored by Kemeng Shi's avatar Kemeng Shi Committed by Andrew Morton

mm/compaction: improve comment of is_via_compact_memory

We do proactive compaction with order == -1 via
1. /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
2. /sys/devices/system/node/nodex/compact
3. /proc/sys/vm/compaction_proactiveness
Add missed situation in which order == -1.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230901155141.249860-6-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: default avatarKemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBaolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: default avatarMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
parent 8df4e28c
...@@ -2065,8 +2065,10 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc) ...@@ -2065,8 +2065,10 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
} }
/* /*
* order == -1 is expected when compacting via * order == -1 is expected when compacting proactively via
* /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory * 1. /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
* 2. /sys/devices/system/node/nodex/compact
* 3. /proc/sys/vm/compaction_proactiveness
*/ */
static inline bool is_via_compact_memory(int order) static inline bool is_via_compact_memory(int order)
{ {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment