Commit a1b0e4e6 authored by Michael Chan's avatar Michael Chan Committed by David S. Miller

bnxt_en: Improve RX consumer index validity check.

There is logic to check that the RX/TPA consumer index is the expected
index to work around a hardware problem.  However, the potentially bad
consumer index is first used to index into an array to reference an entry.
This can potentially crash if the bad consumer index is beyond legal
range.  Improve the logic to use the consumer index for dereferencing
after the validity check and log an error message.

Fixes: fa7e2812 ("bnxt_en: Add workaround to detect bad opaque in rx completion (part 2)")
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent a6252047
......@@ -1133,6 +1133,8 @@ static void bnxt_tpa_start(struct bnxt *bp, struct bnxt_rx_ring_info *rxr,
tpa_info = &rxr->rx_tpa[agg_id];
if (unlikely(cons != rxr->rx_next_cons)) {
netdev_warn(bp->dev, "TPA cons %x != expected cons %x\n",
cons, rxr->rx_next_cons);
bnxt_sched_reset(bp, rxr);
return;
}
......@@ -1585,15 +1587,17 @@ static int bnxt_rx_pkt(struct bnxt *bp, struct bnxt_cp_ring_info *cpr,
}
cons = rxcmp->rx_cmp_opaque;
rx_buf = &rxr->rx_buf_ring[cons];
data = rx_buf->data;
data_ptr = rx_buf->data_ptr;
if (unlikely(cons != rxr->rx_next_cons)) {
int rc1 = bnxt_discard_rx(bp, cpr, raw_cons, rxcmp);
netdev_warn(bp->dev, "RX cons %x != expected cons %x\n",
cons, rxr->rx_next_cons);
bnxt_sched_reset(bp, rxr);
return rc1;
}
rx_buf = &rxr->rx_buf_ring[cons];
data = rx_buf->data;
data_ptr = rx_buf->data_ptr;
prefetch(data_ptr);
misc = le32_to_cpu(rxcmp->rx_cmp_misc_v1);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment