Commit a4d26f1a authored by Paul Walmsley's avatar Paul Walmsley Committed by Masahiro Yamada

modpost: skip ELF local symbols during section mismatch check

During development of a serial console driver with a gcc 8.2.0
toolchain for RISC-V, the following modpost warning appeared:

----
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.data+0x19b10): Section mismatch in reference from the variable .LANCHOR1 to the function .init.text:sifive_serial_console_setup()
The variable .LANCHOR1 references
the function __init sifive_serial_console_setup()
If the reference is valid then annotate the
variable with __init* or __refdata (see linux/init.h) or name the variable:
*_template, *_timer, *_sht, *_ops, *_probe, *_probe_one, *_console
----

".LANCHOR1" is an ELF local symbol, automatically created by gcc's section
anchor generation code:

https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Anchored-Addresses.html

https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=gcc/varasm.c;h=cd9591a45617464946dcf9a126dde277d9de9804;hb=9fb89fa845c1b2e0a18d85ada0b077c84508ab78#l7473

This was verified by compiling the kernel with -fno-section-anchors
and observing that the ".LANCHOR1" ELF local symbol disappeared, and
modpost no longer warned about the section mismatch.  The serial
driver code idiom triggering the warning is standard Linux serial
driver practice that has a specific whitelist inclusion in modpost.c.

I'm neither a modpost nor an ELF expert, but naively, it doesn't seem
useful for modpost to report section mismatch warnings caused by ELF
local symbols by default.  Local symbols have compiler-generated
names, and thus bypass modpost's whitelisting algorithm, which relies
on the presence of a non-autogenerated symbol name.  This increases
the likelihood that false positive warnings will be generated (as in
the above case).

Thus, disable section mismatch reporting on ELF local symbols.  The
rationale here is similar to that of commit 2e3a10a1 ("ARM: avoid
ARM binutils leaking ELF local symbols") and of similar code already
present in modpost.c:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/scripts/mod/modpost.c?h=v4.19-rc4&id=7876320f88802b22d4e2daf7eb027dd14175a0f8#n1256

This third version of the patch implements a suggestion from Masahiro
Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> to restructure the code as an
additional pattern matching step inside secref_whitelist(), and
further improves the patch description.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Acked-by: default avatarSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMasahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
parent 0126be38
...@@ -1163,6 +1163,14 @@ static const struct sectioncheck *section_mismatch( ...@@ -1163,6 +1163,14 @@ static const struct sectioncheck *section_mismatch(
* fromsec = text section * fromsec = text section
* refsymname = *.constprop.* * refsymname = *.constprop.*
* *
* Pattern 6:
* Hide section mismatch warnings for ELF local symbols. The goal
* is to eliminate false positive modpost warnings caused by
* compiler-generated ELF local symbol names such as ".LANCHOR1".
* Autogenerated symbol names bypass modpost's "Pattern 2"
* whitelisting, which relies on pattern-matching against symbol
* names to work. (One situation where gcc can autogenerate ELF
* local symbols is when "-fsection-anchors" is used.)
**/ **/
static int secref_whitelist(const struct sectioncheck *mismatch, static int secref_whitelist(const struct sectioncheck *mismatch,
const char *fromsec, const char *fromsym, const char *fromsec, const char *fromsym,
...@@ -1201,6 +1209,10 @@ static int secref_whitelist(const struct sectioncheck *mismatch, ...@@ -1201,6 +1209,10 @@ static int secref_whitelist(const struct sectioncheck *mismatch,
match(fromsym, optim_symbols)) match(fromsym, optim_symbols))
return 0; return 0;
/* Check for pattern 6 */
if (strstarts(fromsym, ".L"))
return 0;
return 1; return 1;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment