Commit a4da7a3c authored by Veaceslav Falico's avatar Veaceslav Falico Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

af_packet: block BH in prb_shutdown_retire_blk_timer()

[ Upstream commit ec6f809f ]

Currently we're using plain spin_lock() in prb_shutdown_retire_blk_timer(),
however the timer might fire right in the middle and thus try to re-aquire
the same spinlock, leaving us in a endless loop.

To fix that, use the spin_lock_bh() to block it.

Fixes: f6fb8f10 ("af-packet: TPACKET_V3 flexible buffer implementation.")
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
CC: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
CC: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
CC: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: default avatarJan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Tested-by: default avatarJan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Acked-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 63485176
...@@ -504,9 +504,9 @@ static void prb_shutdown_retire_blk_timer(struct packet_sock *po, ...@@ -504,9 +504,9 @@ static void prb_shutdown_retire_blk_timer(struct packet_sock *po,
pkc = tx_ring ? &po->tx_ring.prb_bdqc : &po->rx_ring.prb_bdqc; pkc = tx_ring ? &po->tx_ring.prb_bdqc : &po->rx_ring.prb_bdqc;
spin_lock(&rb_queue->lock); spin_lock_bh(&rb_queue->lock);
pkc->delete_blk_timer = 1; pkc->delete_blk_timer = 1;
spin_unlock(&rb_queue->lock); spin_unlock_bh(&rb_queue->lock);
prb_del_retire_blk_timer(pkc); prb_del_retire_blk_timer(pkc);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment