Commit a53ba15d authored by Andrii Nakryiko's avatar Andrii Nakryiko Committed by Alexei Starovoitov

libbpf: Fix BTF-defined map's __type macro handling of arrays

Due to a quirky C syntax of declaring pointers to array or function
prototype, existing __type() macro doesn't work with map key/value types
that are array or function prototype. One has to create a typedef first
and use it to specify key/value type for a BPF map.  By using typeof(),
pointer to type is now handled uniformly for all kinds of types. Convert
one of self-tests as a demonstration.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191004040211.2434033-1-andriin@fb.com
parent 4bbbf164
...@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ ...@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
#define __BPF_HELPERS__ #define __BPF_HELPERS__
#define __uint(name, val) int (*name)[val] #define __uint(name, val) int (*name)[val]
#define __type(name, val) val *name #define __type(name, val) typeof(val) *name
/* helper macro to print out debug messages */ /* helper macro to print out debug messages */
#define bpf_printk(fmt, ...) \ #define bpf_printk(fmt, ...) \
......
...@@ -47,12 +47,11 @@ struct { ...@@ -47,12 +47,11 @@ struct {
* issue and avoid complicated C programming massaging. * issue and avoid complicated C programming massaging.
* This is an acceptable workaround since there is one entry here. * This is an acceptable workaround since there is one entry here.
*/ */
typedef __u64 raw_stack_trace_t[2 * MAX_STACK_RAWTP];
struct { struct {
__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY); __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY);
__uint(max_entries, 1); __uint(max_entries, 1);
__type(key, __u32); __type(key, __u32);
__type(value, raw_stack_trace_t); __type(value, __u64[2 * MAX_STACK_RAWTP]);
} rawdata_map SEC(".maps"); } rawdata_map SEC(".maps");
SEC("raw_tracepoint/sys_enter") SEC("raw_tracepoint/sys_enter")
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment