Commit a84b69cb authored by Al Viro's avatar Al Viro

9p: forgetting to cancel request on interrupted zero-copy RPC

If we'd already sent a request and decide to abort it, we *must*
issue TFLUSH properly and not just blindly reuse the tag, or
we'll get seriously screwed when response eventually arrives
and we confuse it for response to later request that had reused
the same tag.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.2 and later
Signed-off-by: default avatarAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
parent 43c3dd08
...@@ -843,7 +843,8 @@ static struct p9_req_t *p9_client_zc_rpc(struct p9_client *c, int8_t type, ...@@ -843,7 +843,8 @@ static struct p9_req_t *p9_client_zc_rpc(struct p9_client *c, int8_t type,
if (err < 0) { if (err < 0) {
if (err == -EIO) if (err == -EIO)
c->status = Disconnected; c->status = Disconnected;
goto reterr; if (err != -ERESTARTSYS)
goto reterr;
} }
if (req->status == REQ_STATUS_ERROR) { if (req->status == REQ_STATUS_ERROR) {
p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, "req_status error %d\n", req->t_err); p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, "req_status error %d\n", req->t_err);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment