Commit a8b7b2d0 authored by Jiri Pirko's avatar Jiri Pirko Committed by David S. Miller

sched: sch_api: add missing rcu read lock to silence the warning

In case the qdisc_match_from_root function() is called from non-rcu path
with rtnl mutex held, a suspiciout rcu usage warning appears:

[  241.504354] =============================
[  241.504358] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
[  241.504366] 5.8.0-rc4-custom-01521-g72a7c7d549c3 #32 Not tainted
[  241.504370] -----------------------------
[  241.504378] net/sched/sch_api.c:270 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
[  241.504382]
               other info that might help us debug this:
[  241.504388]
               rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
[  241.504394] 1 lock held by tc/1391:
[  241.504398]  #0: ffffffff85a27850 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x49a/0xbd0
[  241.504431]
               stack backtrace:
[  241.504440] CPU: 0 PID: 1391 Comm: tc Not tainted 5.8.0-rc4-custom-01521-g72a7c7d549c3 #32
[  241.504446] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
[  241.504453] Call Trace:
[  241.504465]  dump_stack+0x100/0x184
[  241.504482]  lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x153/0x15d
[  241.504499]  qdisc_match_from_root+0x293/0x350

Fix this by passing the rtnl held lockdep condition down to
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu()
Reported-by: default avatarIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent d89d8d4d
......@@ -173,9 +173,9 @@ static inline void hash_del_rcu(struct hlist_node *node)
* @member: the name of the hlist_node within the struct
* @key: the key of the objects to iterate over
*/
#define hash_for_each_possible_rcu(name, obj, member, key) \
#define hash_for_each_possible_rcu(name, obj, member, key, cond...) \
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(obj, &name[hash_min(key, HASH_BITS(name))],\
member)
member, ## cond)
/**
* hash_for_each_possible_rcu_notrace - iterate over all possible objects hashing
......
......@@ -267,7 +267,8 @@ static struct Qdisc *qdisc_match_from_root(struct Qdisc *root, u32 handle)
root->handle == handle)
return root;
hash_for_each_possible_rcu(qdisc_dev(root)->qdisc_hash, q, hash, handle) {
hash_for_each_possible_rcu(qdisc_dev(root)->qdisc_hash, q, hash, handle,
lockdep_rtnl_is_held()) {
if (q->handle == handle)
return q;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment