Commit a932b738 authored by Oleg Nesterov's avatar Oleg Nesterov

uprobes/tracing: Kill uprobe_trace_consumer, embed uprobe_consumer into trace_uprobe

trace_uprobe->consumer and "struct uprobe_trace_consumer" add the
unnecessary indirection and complicate the code for no reason.

This patch simply embeds uprobe_consumer into "struct trace_uprobe",
all other changes only fix the compilation errors.
Signed-off-by: default avatarOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
parent b64b0077
...@@ -31,17 +31,11 @@ ...@@ -31,17 +31,11 @@
/* /*
* uprobe event core functions * uprobe event core functions
*/ */
struct trace_uprobe;
struct uprobe_trace_consumer {
struct uprobe_consumer cons;
struct trace_uprobe *tu;
};
struct trace_uprobe { struct trace_uprobe {
struct list_head list; struct list_head list;
struct ftrace_event_class class; struct ftrace_event_class class;
struct ftrace_event_call call; struct ftrace_event_call call;
struct uprobe_trace_consumer *consumer; struct uprobe_consumer consumer;
struct inode *inode; struct inode *inode;
char *filename; char *filename;
unsigned long offset; unsigned long offset;
...@@ -92,6 +86,7 @@ alloc_trace_uprobe(const char *group, const char *event, int nargs) ...@@ -92,6 +86,7 @@ alloc_trace_uprobe(const char *group, const char *event, int nargs)
goto error; goto error;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tu->list); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tu->list);
tu->consumer.handler = uprobe_dispatcher;
return tu; return tu;
error: error:
...@@ -546,27 +541,15 @@ static inline bool is_trace_uprobe_enabled(struct trace_uprobe *tu) ...@@ -546,27 +541,15 @@ static inline bool is_trace_uprobe_enabled(struct trace_uprobe *tu)
static int probe_event_enable(struct trace_uprobe *tu, int flag) static int probe_event_enable(struct trace_uprobe *tu, int flag)
{ {
struct uprobe_trace_consumer *utc;
int ret = 0; int ret = 0;
if (is_trace_uprobe_enabled(tu)) if (is_trace_uprobe_enabled(tu))
return -EINTR; return -EINTR;
utc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct uprobe_trace_consumer), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!utc)
return -EINTR;
utc->cons.handler = uprobe_dispatcher;
utc->tu = tu;
tu->consumer = utc;
tu->flags |= flag; tu->flags |= flag;
ret = uprobe_register(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer);
ret = uprobe_register(tu->inode, tu->offset, &utc->cons); if (ret)
if (ret) {
tu->consumer = NULL;
tu->flags &= ~flag; tu->flags &= ~flag;
kfree(utc);
}
return ret; return ret;
} }
...@@ -576,10 +559,8 @@ static void probe_event_disable(struct trace_uprobe *tu, int flag) ...@@ -576,10 +559,8 @@ static void probe_event_disable(struct trace_uprobe *tu, int flag)
if (!is_trace_uprobe_enabled(tu)) if (!is_trace_uprobe_enabled(tu))
return; return;
uprobe_unregister(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer->cons); uprobe_unregister(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer);
tu->flags &= ~flag; tu->flags &= ~flag;
kfree(tu->consumer);
tu->consumer = NULL;
} }
static int uprobe_event_define_fields(struct ftrace_event_call *event_call) static int uprobe_event_define_fields(struct ftrace_event_call *event_call)
...@@ -717,13 +698,9 @@ int trace_uprobe_register(struct ftrace_event_call *event, enum trace_reg type, ...@@ -717,13 +698,9 @@ int trace_uprobe_register(struct ftrace_event_call *event, enum trace_reg type,
static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs) static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs)
{ {
struct uprobe_trace_consumer *utc;
struct trace_uprobe *tu; struct trace_uprobe *tu;
utc = container_of(con, struct uprobe_trace_consumer, cons); tu = container_of(con, struct trace_uprobe, consumer);
tu = utc->tu;
if (!tu || tu->consumer != utc)
return 0;
if (tu->flags & TP_FLAG_TRACE) if (tu->flags & TP_FLAG_TRACE)
uprobe_trace_func(tu, regs); uprobe_trace_func(tu, regs);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment