Commit aa343c69 authored by Tyrel Datwyler's avatar Tyrel Datwyler Committed by Martin K. Petersen

scsi: ibmvscsi: fix tripping of blk_mq_run_hw_queue WARN_ON

After a successful SRP login response we call scsi_unblock_requests() to
kick any pending IOs. The callback to process this SRP response happens in
a tasklet and therefore is in softirq context. The result of such is that
when blk-mq is enabled, it is no longer safe to call scsi_unblock_requests()
from this context. The result of duing so triggers the following WARN_ON
splat in dmesg after a host reset or CRQ reenablement.

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at block/blk-mq.c:1375 __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x120/0x180
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc8 #4
NIP [c0000000009771e0] __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x120/0x180
LR [c000000000977484] __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue+0x244/0x250
Call Trace:

__blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue+0x244/0x250
blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x8c/0x1c0
blk_mq_run_hw_queues+0x60/0x90
scsi_run_queue+0x1e4/0x3b0
scsi_run_host_queues+0x48/0x80
login_rsp+0xb0/0x100
ibmvscsi_handle_crq+0x30c/0x3e0
ibmvscsi_task+0x54/0xe0
tasklet_action_common.isra.3+0xc4/0x1a0
__do_softirq+0x174/0x3f4
irq_exit+0xf0/0x120
__do_irq+0xb0/0x210
call_do_irq+0x14/0x24
do_IRQ+0x9c/0x130
hardware_interrupt_common+0x14c/0x150

This patch fixes the issue by introducing a new host action for unblocking
the scsi requests in our seperate work thread.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
parent 6e40de8b
...@@ -1179,7 +1179,8 @@ static void login_rsp(struct srp_event_struct *evt_struct) ...@@ -1179,7 +1179,8 @@ static void login_rsp(struct srp_event_struct *evt_struct)
be32_to_cpu(evt_struct->xfer_iu->srp.login_rsp.req_lim_delta)); be32_to_cpu(evt_struct->xfer_iu->srp.login_rsp.req_lim_delta));
/* If we had any pending I/Os, kick them */ /* If we had any pending I/Os, kick them */
scsi_unblock_requests(hostdata->host); hostdata->action = IBMVSCSI_HOST_ACTION_UNBLOCK;
wake_up(&hostdata->work_wait_q);
} }
/** /**
...@@ -2123,6 +2124,7 @@ static void ibmvscsi_do_work(struct ibmvscsi_host_data *hostdata) ...@@ -2123,6 +2124,7 @@ static void ibmvscsi_do_work(struct ibmvscsi_host_data *hostdata)
spin_lock_irqsave(hostdata->host->host_lock, flags); spin_lock_irqsave(hostdata->host->host_lock, flags);
switch (hostdata->action) { switch (hostdata->action) {
case IBMVSCSI_HOST_ACTION_NONE: case IBMVSCSI_HOST_ACTION_NONE:
case IBMVSCSI_HOST_ACTION_UNBLOCK:
break; break;
case IBMVSCSI_HOST_ACTION_RESET: case IBMVSCSI_HOST_ACTION_RESET:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(hostdata->host->host_lock, flags); spin_unlock_irqrestore(hostdata->host->host_lock, flags);
...@@ -2164,6 +2166,7 @@ static int __ibmvscsi_work_to_do(struct ibmvscsi_host_data *hostdata) ...@@ -2164,6 +2166,7 @@ static int __ibmvscsi_work_to_do(struct ibmvscsi_host_data *hostdata)
return 0; return 0;
case IBMVSCSI_HOST_ACTION_RESET: case IBMVSCSI_HOST_ACTION_RESET:
case IBMVSCSI_HOST_ACTION_REENABLE: case IBMVSCSI_HOST_ACTION_REENABLE:
case IBMVSCSI_HOST_ACTION_UNBLOCK:
default: default:
break; break;
} }
......
...@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ enum ibmvscsi_host_action { ...@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ enum ibmvscsi_host_action {
IBMVSCSI_HOST_ACTION_NONE = 0, IBMVSCSI_HOST_ACTION_NONE = 0,
IBMVSCSI_HOST_ACTION_RESET, IBMVSCSI_HOST_ACTION_RESET,
IBMVSCSI_HOST_ACTION_REENABLE, IBMVSCSI_HOST_ACTION_REENABLE,
IBMVSCSI_HOST_ACTION_UNBLOCK,
}; };
/* all driver data associated with a host adapter */ /* all driver data associated with a host adapter */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment