Commit b106bcf0 authored by David Laight's avatar David Laight Committed by Linus Torvalds

locking/osq_lock: Clarify osq_wait_next()

Directly return NULL or 'next' instead of breaking out of the loop.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Laight <david.laight@aculab.com>
[ Split original patch into two independent parts  - Linus ]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7c8828aec72e42eeb841ca0ee3397e9a@AcuMS.aculab.com/Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 563adbfc
......@@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ osq_wait_next(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock,
struct optimistic_spin_node *node,
int old_cpu)
{
struct optimistic_spin_node *next = NULL;
int curr = encode_cpu(smp_processor_id());
for (;;) {
......@@ -66,7 +65,7 @@ osq_wait_next(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock,
* will now observe @lock and will complete its
* unlock()/unqueue().
*/
break;
return NULL;
}
/*
......@@ -80,15 +79,15 @@ osq_wait_next(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock,
* wait for a new @node->next from its Step-C.
*/
if (node->next) {
struct optimistic_spin_node *next;
next = xchg(&node->next, NULL);
if (next)
break;
return next;
}
cpu_relax();
}
return next;
}
bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment