Commit b4406e10 authored by Alexei Starovoitov's avatar Alexei Starovoitov

Merge branch 'follow-up-for-__jited-test-tag'

Eduard Zingerman says:

====================
follow up for __jited test tag

This patch-set is a collection of follow-ups for
"__jited test tag to check disassembly after jit" series (see [1]).

First patch is most important:
as it turns out, I broke all test_loader based tests for s390 CI.
E.g. see log [2] for s390 execution of test_progs,
note all 'verivier_*' tests being skipped.
This happens because of incorrect handling of corner case when
get_current_arch() does not know which architecture to return.

Second patch makes matching of function return sequence in
verifier_tailcall_jit more flexible:

    -__jited("	retq")
    +__jited("	{{(retq|jmp	0x)}}")

The difference could be seen with and w/o mitigations=off boot
parameter for test VM (CI runs with mitigations=off, hence it
generates retq).

Third patch addresses Alexei's request to add #define and a comment in
jit_disasm_helpers.c.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240820102357.3372779-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/
[2] https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10518445973/job/29144511595
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240823080644.263943-1-eddyz87@gmail.comSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
parents 7559a7a8 21a56fc5
...@@ -16,6 +16,11 @@ ...@@ -16,6 +16,11 @@
*/ */
#define MAX_LOCAL_LABELS 32 #define MAX_LOCAL_LABELS 32
/* Local labels are encoded as 'L42', this requires 4 bytes of storage:
* 3 characters + zero byte
*/
#define LOCAL_LABEL_LEN 4
static bool llvm_initialized; static bool llvm_initialized;
struct local_labels { struct local_labels {
...@@ -23,7 +28,7 @@ struct local_labels { ...@@ -23,7 +28,7 @@ struct local_labels {
__u32 prog_len; __u32 prog_len;
__u32 cnt; __u32 cnt;
__u32 pcs[MAX_LOCAL_LABELS]; __u32 pcs[MAX_LOCAL_LABELS];
char names[MAX_LOCAL_LABELS][4]; char names[MAX_LOCAL_LABELS][LOCAL_LABEL_LEN];
}; };
static const char *lookup_symbol(void *data, uint64_t ref_value, uint64_t *ref_type, static const char *lookup_symbol(void *data, uint64_t ref_value, uint64_t *ref_type,
...@@ -118,8 +123,14 @@ static int disasm_one_func(FILE *text_out, uint8_t *image, __u32 len) ...@@ -118,8 +123,14 @@ static int disasm_one_func(FILE *text_out, uint8_t *image, __u32 len)
} }
qsort(labels.pcs, labels.cnt, sizeof(*labels.pcs), cmp_u32); qsort(labels.pcs, labels.cnt, sizeof(*labels.pcs), cmp_u32);
for (i = 0; i < labels.cnt; ++i) for (i = 0; i < labels.cnt; ++i)
/* use (i % 100) to avoid format truncation warning */ /* gcc is unable to infer upper bound for labels.cnt and assumes
snprintf(labels.names[i], sizeof(labels.names[i]), "L%d", i % 100); * it to be U32_MAX. U32_MAX takes 10 decimal digits.
* snprintf below prints into labels.names[*],
* which has space only for two digits and a letter.
* To avoid truncation warning use (i % MAX_LOCAL_LABELS),
* which informs gcc about printed value upper bound.
*/
snprintf(labels.names[i], sizeof(labels.names[i]), "L%d", i % MAX_LOCAL_LABELS);
/* now print with labels */ /* now print with labels */
labels.print_phase = true; labels.print_phase = true;
......
...@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ __jited(" movq -0x10(%rbp), %rax") ...@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ __jited(" movq -0x10(%rbp), %rax")
__jited(" callq 0x{{.*}}") /* call to sub() */ __jited(" callq 0x{{.*}}") /* call to sub() */
__jited(" xorl %eax, %eax") __jited(" xorl %eax, %eax")
__jited(" leave") __jited(" leave")
__jited(" retq") __jited(" {{(retq|jmp 0x)}}") /* return or jump to rethunk */
__jited("...") __jited("...")
/* subprogram entry for sub(), regular function prologue */ /* subprogram entry for sub(), regular function prologue */
__jited(" endbr64") __jited(" endbr64")
...@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ __jited(" popq %rax") ...@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ __jited(" popq %rax")
__jited(" popq %rax") __jited(" popq %rax")
__jited(" jmp {{.*}}") /* jump to tail call tgt */ __jited(" jmp {{.*}}") /* jump to tail call tgt */
__jited("L0: leave") __jited("L0: leave")
__jited(" retq") __jited(" {{(retq|jmp 0x)}}") /* return or jump to rethunk */
SEC("tc") SEC("tc")
__naked int main(void) __naked int main(void)
{ {
......
...@@ -336,9 +336,10 @@ static const char *skip_dynamic_pfx(const char *s, const char *pfx) ...@@ -336,9 +336,10 @@ static const char *skip_dynamic_pfx(const char *s, const char *pfx)
} }
enum arch { enum arch {
ARCH_X86_64 = 0x1, ARCH_UNKNOWN = 0x1,
ARCH_ARM64 = 0x2, ARCH_X86_64 = 0x2,
ARCH_RISCV64 = 0x4, ARCH_ARM64 = 0x4,
ARCH_RISCV64 = 0x8,
}; };
static int get_current_arch(void) static int get_current_arch(void)
...@@ -350,7 +351,7 @@ static int get_current_arch(void) ...@@ -350,7 +351,7 @@ static int get_current_arch(void)
#elif defined(__riscv) && __riscv_xlen == 64 #elif defined(__riscv) && __riscv_xlen == 64
return ARCH_RISCV64; return ARCH_RISCV64;
#endif #endif
return 0; return ARCH_UNKNOWN;
} }
/* Uses btf_decl_tag attributes to describe the expected test /* Uses btf_decl_tag attributes to describe the expected test
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment