Commit b698c784 authored by Hans Verkuil's avatar Hans Verkuil Committed by Mauro Carvalho Chehab

[media] V4L2 spec: fix the description of V4L2_FBUF_CAP_SRC_CHROMAKEY

V4L2_FBUF_CAP_SRC_CHROMAKEY is the opposite of V4L2_FBUF_CAP_CHROMAKEY, but
according to the documentation it was the same. The terms 'video' and
'framebuffer' were accidentally swapped in the text.
Signed-off-by: default avatarHans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
CC: Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
parent 43599f31
......@@ -340,8 +340,8 @@ blending makes no sense for destructive overlays.</entry>
<row>
<entry><constant>V4L2_FBUF_CAP_SRC_CHROMAKEY</constant></entry>
<entry>0x0080</entry>
<entry>The device supports Source Chroma-keying. Framebuffer pixels
with the chroma-key colors are replaced by video pixels, which is exactly opposite of
<entry>The device supports Source Chroma-keying. Video pixels
with the chroma-key colors are replaced by framebuffer pixels, which is exactly opposite of
<constant>V4L2_FBUF_CAP_CHROMAKEY</constant></entry>
</row>
</tbody>
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment