Commit b6ebaa81 authored by Ross Lagerwall's avatar Ross Lagerwall Committed by Juergen Gross

xen/blkfront: Only check REQ_FUA for writes

The existing code silently converts read operations with the
REQ_FUA bit set into write-barrier operations. This results in data
loss as the backend scribbles zeroes over the data instead of returning
it.

While the REQ_FUA bit doesn't make sense on a read operation, at least
one well-known out-of-tree kernel module does set it and since it
results in data loss, let's be safe here and only look at REQ_FUA for
writes.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRoss Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>
Acked-by: default avatarJuergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230426164005.2213139-1-ross.lagerwall@citrix.comSigned-off-by: default avatarJuergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
parent cbfac770
......@@ -780,7 +780,8 @@ static int blkif_queue_rw_req(struct request *req, struct blkfront_ring_info *ri
ring_req->u.rw.handle = info->handle;
ring_req->operation = rq_data_dir(req) ?
BLKIF_OP_WRITE : BLKIF_OP_READ;
if (req_op(req) == REQ_OP_FLUSH || req->cmd_flags & REQ_FUA) {
if (req_op(req) == REQ_OP_FLUSH ||
(req_op(req) == REQ_OP_WRITE && (req->cmd_flags & REQ_FUA))) {
/*
* Ideally we can do an unordered flush-to-disk.
* In case the backend onlysupports barriers, use that.
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment