Commit b7906b70 authored by Andrii Nakryiko's avatar Andrii Nakryiko Committed by Linus Torvalds

bpf: Fix enum names for bpf_this_cpu_ptr() and bpf_per_cpu_ptr() helpers

Remove bpf_ prefix, which causes these helpers to be reported in verifier
dump as bpf_bpf_this_cpu_ptr() and bpf_bpf_per_cpu_ptr(), respectively. Lets
fix it as long as it is still possible before UAPI freezes on these helpers.

Fixes: eaa6bcb7 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_per_cpu_ptr()")
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent a06caa4a
......@@ -3897,8 +3897,8 @@ union bpf_attr {
FN(seq_printf_btf), \
FN(skb_cgroup_classid), \
FN(redirect_neigh), \
FN(bpf_per_cpu_ptr), \
FN(bpf_this_cpu_ptr), \
FN(per_cpu_ptr), \
FN(this_cpu_ptr), \
FN(redirect_peer), \
/* */
......
......@@ -717,9 +717,9 @@ bpf_base_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
return &bpf_snprintf_btf_proto;
case BPF_FUNC_jiffies64:
return &bpf_jiffies64_proto;
case BPF_FUNC_bpf_per_cpu_ptr:
case BPF_FUNC_per_cpu_ptr:
return &bpf_per_cpu_ptr_proto;
case BPF_FUNC_bpf_this_cpu_ptr:
case BPF_FUNC_this_cpu_ptr:
return &bpf_this_cpu_ptr_proto;
default:
break;
......
......@@ -1337,9 +1337,9 @@ bpf_tracing_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
return prog->aux->sleepable ? &bpf_copy_from_user_proto : NULL;
case BPF_FUNC_snprintf_btf:
return &bpf_snprintf_btf_proto;
case BPF_FUNC_bpf_per_cpu_ptr:
case BPF_FUNC_per_cpu_ptr:
return &bpf_per_cpu_ptr_proto;
case BPF_FUNC_bpf_this_cpu_ptr:
case BPF_FUNC_this_cpu_ptr:
return &bpf_this_cpu_ptr_proto;
default:
return NULL;
......
......@@ -3897,8 +3897,8 @@ union bpf_attr {
FN(seq_printf_btf), \
FN(skb_cgroup_classid), \
FN(redirect_neigh), \
FN(bpf_per_cpu_ptr), \
FN(bpf_this_cpu_ptr), \
FN(per_cpu_ptr), \
FN(this_cpu_ptr), \
FN(redirect_peer), \
/* */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment