Commit b7abb051 authored by Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi's avatar Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi Committed by Miquel Raynal

mtd: fix lock hierarchy in deregister_mtd_blktrans

There is a lock hierarchy of major_names_lock --> mtd_table_mutex. One
existing chain is as follows:

1. major_names_lock --> loop_ctl_mutex (when blk_request_module calls
loop_probe)

2. loop_ctl_mutex --> bdev->bd_mutex (when loop_control_ioctl calls
loop_remove, which then calls del_gendisk)

3. bdev->bd_mutex --> mtd_table_mutex (when blkdev_get_by_dev calls
__blkdev_get, which then calls blktrans_open)

Since unregister_blkdev grabs the major_names_lock, we need to call it
outside the critical section for mtd_table_mutex, otherwise we invert
the lock hierarchy.
Reported-by: default avatarHillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDesmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMiquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20210717100719.728829-1-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com
parent 99dc4ad9
...@@ -561,8 +561,8 @@ int deregister_mtd_blktrans(struct mtd_blktrans_ops *tr) ...@@ -561,8 +561,8 @@ int deregister_mtd_blktrans(struct mtd_blktrans_ops *tr)
list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, next, &tr->devs, list) list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, next, &tr->devs, list)
tr->remove_dev(dev); tr->remove_dev(dev);
unregister_blkdev(tr->major, tr->name);
mutex_unlock(&mtd_table_mutex); mutex_unlock(&mtd_table_mutex);
unregister_blkdev(tr->major, tr->name);
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&tr->devs)); BUG_ON(!list_empty(&tr->devs));
return 0; return 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment