ASoC: soc-dapm.c: tidyup error handling on snd_soc_dapm_add_route()
Current error handling on snd_soc_dapm_add_route() has some wastes. It indicates *own* error message *only* for sink or source, and return error directly at (A). OTOH, it has similar error message at (B) which indicates *both* sink/source. And more, (A) is using dev_err(), (B) is using dev_warn(). (B) is caring prefix, but (A) is not. (X) int snd_soc_dapm_add_route(...) { ... if (wsource == NULL) { (A) dev_err(...); return -ENODEV; } if (wsink == NULL) { (A) dev_err(...); return -ENODEV; } ... ret = snd_soc_dapm_add_path(...); if (ret) (B) goto err; return 0; err: (B) dev_warn(...); return ret; } Above snd_soc_dapm_add_route() (= X) is called from snd_soc_dapm_add_routes() (= Y). (X) will indicate error message by itself, but (Y) will indicate own error message at (C). (C) is duplicated. (Y) int snd_soc_dapm_add_routes(...) { ... for (...) { (X) int r = snd_soc_dapm_add_route(...); if (r < 0) { (C) dev_err(...); ret = r; } ... } ... } This patch (1) merges these error message (= A,B) into one, (2) use dev_err(), (3) remove duplicate error message (= C) from snd_soc_dapm_add_routes(). By this patch, it will indicate error message like this. - error message with prefix - not found widget will have "(*)" mark - it indicates [control] if exists. ex) [if no sink with control] ASoC: Failed to add route SOURCE -> [CTRL] -> SINK(*) [if no source without control] ASoC: Failed to add route SOURCE(*) -> SINK Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87zgduowe5.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.comSigned-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment