hrtimer: Allow concurrent hrtimer_start() for self restarting timers
commit 5de2755c upstream. Because we drop cpu_base->lock around calling hrtimer::function, it is possible for hrtimer_start() to come in between and enqueue the timer. If hrtimer::function then returns HRTIMER_RESTART we'll hit the BUG_ON because HRTIMER_STATE_ENQUEUED will be set. Since the above is a perfectly valid scenario, remove the BUG_ON and make the enqueue_hrtimer() call conditional on the timer not being enqueued already. NOTE: in that concurrent scenario its entirely common for both sites to want to modify the hrtimer, since hrtimers don't provide serialization themselves be sure to provide some such that the hrtimer::function and the hrtimer_start() caller don't both try and fudge the expiration state at the same time. To that effect, add a WARN when someone tries to forward an already enqueued timer, the most common way to change the expiry of self restarting timers. Ideally we'd put the WARN in everything modifying the expiry but most of that is inlines and we don't need the bloat. Fixes: 2d44ae4d ("hrtimer: clean up cpu->base locking tricks") Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru> Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150415113105.GT5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> [bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust filename, context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment