Commit bab73f09 authored by Stanley.Yang's avatar Stanley.Yang Committed by Alex Deucher

drm/amdgpu: skip query ecc info in gpu recovery

this is a workaround due to get ecc info failed during gpu recovery

[  700.236122] amdgpu 0000:09:00.0: amdgpu: Failed to export SMU ecc table!
[  700.236128] amdgpu 0000:09:00.0: amdgpu: GPU reset begin!
[  704.331171] amdgpu: qcm fence wait loop timeout expired
[  704.331194] amdgpu: The cp might be in an unrecoverable state due to an unsuccessful queues preemption
[  704.332445] amdgpu 0000:09:00.0: amdgpu: GPU reset begin!
[  704.332448] amdgpu 0000:09:00.0: amdgpu: Bailing on TDR for s_job:ffffffffffffffff, as another already in progress
[  704.332456] amdgpu: Pasid 0x8000 destroy queue 0 failed, ret -62
[  710.360924] amdgpu 0000:09:00.0: amdgpu: SMU: I'm not done with your previous command: SMN_C2PMSG_66:0x00000013 SMN_C2PMSG_82:0x00000007
[  710.360964] amdgpu 0000:09:00.0: amdgpu: Failed to disable smu features.
[  710.361002] amdgpu 0000:09:00.0: amdgpu: Fail to disable dpm features!
[  710.361014] [drm:amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase2 [amdgpu]] *ERROR* suspend of IP block <smu> failed -62
Signed-off-by: default avatarStanley.Yang <Stanley.Yang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarHawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
parent ddb267b6
...@@ -897,6 +897,10 @@ static void amdgpu_ras_get_ecc_info(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct ras_err_d ...@@ -897,6 +897,10 @@ static void amdgpu_ras_get_ecc_info(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct ras_err_d
struct amdgpu_ras *ras = amdgpu_ras_get_context(adev); struct amdgpu_ras *ras = amdgpu_ras_get_context(adev);
int ret = 0; int ret = 0;
/* skip get ecc info during gpu recovery */
if (atomic_read(&ras->in_recovery) == 1)
return;
/* /*
* choosing right query method according to * choosing right query method according to
* whether smu support query error information * whether smu support query error information
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment