Commit bace7117 authored by Ingo Molnar's avatar Ingo Molnar

x86/asm/entry: (Re-)rename __NR_entry_INT80_compat_max to __NR_syscall_compat_max

Brian Gerst noticed that I did a weird rename in the following commit:

   b2502b41 ("x86/asm/entry: Untangle 'system_call' into two entry points: entry_SYSCALL_64 and entry_INT80_32")

which renamed __NR_ia32_syscall_max to __NR_entry_INT80_compat_max.

Now the original name was a misnomer, but the new one is a misnomer as well,
as all the 32-bit compat syscall entry points (sysenter, syscall) share the
system call table, not just the INT80 based one.

Rename it to __NR_syscall_compat_max.
Reported-by: default avatarBrian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent eb478544
...@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ ...@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
#else #else
#define SYM(sym, compat) sym #define SYM(sym, compat) sym
#define ia32_sys_call_table sys_call_table #define ia32_sys_call_table sys_call_table
#define __NR_entry_INT80_compat_max __NR_syscall_max #define __NR_syscall_compat_max __NR_syscall_max
#endif #endif
#define __SYSCALL_I386(nr, sym, compat) extern asmlinkage void SYM(sym, compat)(void) ; #define __SYSCALL_I386(nr, sym, compat) extern asmlinkage void SYM(sym, compat)(void) ;
...@@ -23,11 +23,11 @@ typedef asmlinkage void (*sys_call_ptr_t)(void); ...@@ -23,11 +23,11 @@ typedef asmlinkage void (*sys_call_ptr_t)(void);
extern asmlinkage void sys_ni_syscall(void); extern asmlinkage void sys_ni_syscall(void);
__visible const sys_call_ptr_t ia32_sys_call_table[__NR_entry_INT80_compat_max+1] = { __visible const sys_call_ptr_t ia32_sys_call_table[__NR_syscall_compat_max+1] = {
/* /*
* Smells like a compiler bug -- it doesn't work * Smells like a compiler bug -- it doesn't work
* when the & below is removed. * when the & below is removed.
*/ */
[0 ... __NR_entry_INT80_compat_max] = &sys_ni_syscall, [0 ... __NR_syscall_compat_max] = &sys_ni_syscall,
#include <asm/syscalls_32.h> #include <asm/syscalls_32.h>
}; };
...@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ int main(void) ...@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ int main(void)
DEFINE(__NR_syscall_max, sizeof(syscalls_64) - 1); DEFINE(__NR_syscall_max, sizeof(syscalls_64) - 1);
DEFINE(NR_syscalls, sizeof(syscalls_64)); DEFINE(NR_syscalls, sizeof(syscalls_64));
DEFINE(__NR_entry_INT80_compat_max, sizeof(syscalls_ia32) - 1); DEFINE(__NR_syscall_compat_max, sizeof(syscalls_ia32) - 1);
DEFINE(IA32_NR_syscalls, sizeof(syscalls_ia32)); DEFINE(IA32_NR_syscalls, sizeof(syscalls_ia32));
return 0; return 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment