Commit bbd9f14c authored by Ingo Molnar's avatar Ingo Molnar

[PATCH] signal failures in nightly LTP test

On 13 Sep 2002, Paul Larson wrote:
>
> The nightly LTP test against the 2.5 kernel bk tree last night turned up
> some test failures we don't normally see.  These failures did not show
> up in the run from the previous night.

[...]
> I found what was breaking this, looks like it was this change from your
> shared thread signals patch:
> -	if (sig < 1 || sig > _NSIG ||
> -	    (act && (sig == SIGKILL || sig == SIGSTOP)))
> +	if (sig < 1 || sig > _NSIG || (act && sig_kernel_only(sig)))

This fixes this bug and a number of others in the same class - the
signal behavior bitmasks should never be consulted before making sure
that the signal is in the word range.
parent eda4d244
...@@ -118,14 +118,18 @@ int max_queued_signals = 1024; ...@@ -118,14 +118,18 @@ int max_queued_signals = 1024;
#define T(sig, mask) \ #define T(sig, mask) \
((1UL << (sig)) & mask) ((1UL << (sig)) & mask)
#define sig_user_specific(sig) T(sig, SIG_USER_SPECIFIC_MASK) #define sig_user_specific(sig) \
(((sig) < SIGRTMIN) && T(sig, SIG_USER_SPECIFIC_MASK))
#define sig_user_load_balance(sig) \ #define sig_user_load_balance(sig) \
(T(sig, SIG_USER_LOAD_BALANCE_MASK) || ((sig) >= SIGRTMIN)) (((sig) >= SIGRTMIN) || T(sig, SIG_USER_LOAD_BALANCE_MASK))
#define sig_kernel_specific(sig) T(sig, SIG_KERNEL_SPECIFIC_MASK) #define sig_kernel_specific(sig) \
(((sig) < SIGRTMIN) && T(sig, SIG_KERNEL_SPECIFIC_MASK))
#define sig_kernel_broadcast(sig) \ #define sig_kernel_broadcast(sig) \
(T(sig, SIG_KERNEL_BROADCAST_MASK) || ((sig) >= SIGRTMIN)) (((sig) >= SIGRTMIN) || T(sig, SIG_KERNEL_BROADCAST_MASK))
#define sig_kernel_only(sig) T(sig, SIG_KERNEL_ONLY_MASK) #define sig_kernel_only(sig) \
#define sig_kernel_coredump(sig) T(sig, SIG_KERNEL_COREDUMP_MASK) (((sig) < SIGRTMIN) && T(sig, SIG_KERNEL_ONLY_MASK))
#define sig_kernel_coredump(sig) \
(((sig) < SIGRTMIN) && T(sig, SIG_KERNEL_COREDUMP_MASK))
#define sig_user_defined(t, sig) \ #define sig_user_defined(t, sig) \
(((t)->sig->action[(sig)-1].sa.sa_handler != SIG_DFL) && \ (((t)->sig->action[(sig)-1].sa.sa_handler != SIG_DFL) && \
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment