Commit bc80c2e4 authored by Rafael J. Wysocki's avatar Rafael J. Wysocki

PM: runtime: Do not call __rpm_callback() from rpm_idle()

Calling __rpm_callback() from rpm_idle() after adding device links
support to the former is a clear mistake.

Not only it causes rpm_idle() to carry out unnecessary actions, but it
is also against the assumption regarding the stability of PM-runtime
status across __rpm_callback() invocations, because rpm_suspend() and
rpm_resume() may run in parallel with __rpm_callback() when it is called
by rpm_idle() and the device's PM-runtime status can be updated by any
of them.

Fixes: 21d5c57b ("PM / runtime: Use device links")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/36aed941-a73e-d937-2721-4f0decd61ce0@quicinc.comSigned-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAdrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
parent 76dcd734
......@@ -484,7 +484,17 @@ static int rpm_idle(struct device *dev, int rpmflags)
dev->power.idle_notification = true;
retval = __rpm_callback(callback, dev);
if (dev->power.irq_safe)
spin_unlock(&dev->power.lock);
else
spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
retval = callback(dev);
if (dev->power.irq_safe)
spin_lock(&dev->power.lock);
else
spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
dev->power.idle_notification = false;
wake_up_all(&dev->power.wait_queue);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment