Commit c291b015 authored by Dou Liyang's avatar Dou Liyang Committed by Ingo Molnar

x86/apic: Fix num_processors value in case of failure

If the topology package map check of the APIC ID and the CPU is a failure,
we don't generate the processor info for that APIC ID yet we increase
disabled_cpus by one - which is buggy.

Only increase num_processors once we are sure we don't fail.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: default avatarDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473214893-16481-1-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
[ Rewrote the changelog. ]
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent db91e237
...@@ -2093,7 +2093,6 @@ int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version) ...@@ -2093,7 +2093,6 @@ int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
return -EINVAL; return -EINVAL;
} }
num_processors++;
if (apicid == boot_cpu_physical_apicid) { if (apicid == boot_cpu_physical_apicid) {
/* /*
* x86_bios_cpu_apicid is required to have processors listed * x86_bios_cpu_apicid is required to have processors listed
...@@ -2116,10 +2115,13 @@ int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version) ...@@ -2116,10 +2115,13 @@ int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
pr_warning("APIC: Package limit reached. Processor %d/0x%x ignored.\n", pr_warning("APIC: Package limit reached. Processor %d/0x%x ignored.\n",
thiscpu, apicid); thiscpu, apicid);
disabled_cpus++; disabled_cpus++;
return -ENOSPC; return -ENOSPC;
} }
num_processors++;
/* /*
* Validate version * Validate version
*/ */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment