Commit c4dc3046 authored by Francesco Ruggeri's avatar Francesco Ruggeri Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

tty: Fix pty master poll() after slave closes v2

Commit f95499c3 ("n_tty: Don't wait for buffer work in read() loop")
introduces a race window where a pty master can be signalled that the pty
slave was closed before all the data that the slave wrote is delivered.
Commit f8747d4a ("tty: Fix pty master read() after slave closes") fixed the
problem in case of n_tty_read, but the problem still exists for n_tty_poll.
This can be seen by running 'for ((i=0; i<100;i++));do ./test.py ;done'
where test.py is:

import os, select, pty

(pid, pty_fd) = pty.fork()

if pid == 0:
   os.write(1, 'This string should be received by parent')
else:
   poller = select.epoll()
   poller.register( pty_fd, select.EPOLLIN )
   ready = poller.poll( 1 * 1000 )
   for fd, events in ready:
      if not events & select.EPOLLIN:
         print 'missed POLLIN event'
      else:
         print os.read(fd, 100)
   poller.close()

The string from the slave is missed several times.
This patch takes the same approach as the fix for read and special cases
this condition for poll.
Tested on 3.16.
Signed-off-by: default avatarFrancesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 7e12e675
......@@ -2413,12 +2413,17 @@ static unsigned int n_tty_poll(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *file,
poll_wait(file, &tty->read_wait, wait);
poll_wait(file, &tty->write_wait, wait);
if (test_bit(TTY_OTHER_CLOSED, &tty->flags))
mask |= POLLHUP;
if (input_available_p(tty, 1))
mask |= POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
else if (mask & POLLHUP) {
tty_flush_to_ldisc(tty);
if (input_available_p(tty, 1))
mask |= POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
}
if (tty->packet && tty->link->ctrl_status)
mask |= POLLPRI | POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
if (test_bit(TTY_OTHER_CLOSED, &tty->flags))
mask |= POLLHUP;
if (tty_hung_up_p(file))
mask |= POLLHUP;
if (!(mask & (POLLHUP | POLLIN | POLLRDNORM))) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment