Commit c4e4fccc authored by Wayne Lin's avatar Wayne Lin Committed by Lyude Paul

drm/dp_mst: correct the shifting in DP_REMOTE_I2C_READ

[Why]
According to DP spec, it should shift left 4 digits for NO_STOP_BIT
in REMOTE_I2C_READ message. Not 5 digits.

In current code, NO_STOP_BIT is always set to zero which means I2C
master is always generating a I2C stop at the end of each I2C write
transaction while handling REMOTE_I2C_READ sideband message. This issue
might have the generated I2C signal not meeting the requirement. Take
random read in I2C for instance, I2C master should generate a repeat
start to start to read data after writing the read address. This issue
will cause the I2C master to generate a stop-start rather than a
re-start which is not expected in I2C random read.

[How]
Correct the shifting value of NO_STOP_BIT for DP_REMOTE_I2C_READ case in
drm_dp_encode_sideband_req().

Changes since v1:(https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11312667/)
* Add more descriptions in commit and cc to stable

Fixes: ad7f8a1f ("drm/helper: add Displayport multi-stream helper (v0.6)")
Reviewed-by: default avatarHarry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarWayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200103055001.10287-1-Wayne.Lin@amd.com
parent ac2917b0
......@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ drm_dp_encode_sideband_req(const struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body *req,
memcpy(&buf[idx], req->u.i2c_read.transactions[i].bytes, req->u.i2c_read.transactions[i].num_bytes);
idx += req->u.i2c_read.transactions[i].num_bytes;
buf[idx] = (req->u.i2c_read.transactions[i].no_stop_bit & 0x1) << 5;
buf[idx] = (req->u.i2c_read.transactions[i].no_stop_bit & 0x1) << 4;
buf[idx] |= (req->u.i2c_read.transactions[i].i2c_transaction_delay & 0xf);
idx++;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment