Commit c5c7b8dd authored by Jan Kara's avatar Jan Kara Committed by Theodore Ts'o

ext4: Fix buffer double free in ext4_alloc_branch()

Error recovery in ext4_alloc_branch() calls ext4_forget() even for
buffer corresponding to indirect block it did not allocate. This leads
to brelse() being called twice for that buffer (once from ext4_forget()
and once from cleanup in ext4_ind_map_blocks()) leading to buffer use
count misaccounting. Eventually (but often much later because there
are other users of the buffer) we will see messages like:
VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer

Another manifestation of this problem is an error:
JBD2 unexpected failure: jbd2_journal_revoke: !buffer_revoked(bh);
inconsistent data on disk

The fix is easy - don't forget buffer we did not allocate. Also add an
explanatory comment because the indexing at ext4_alloc_branch() is
somewhat subtle.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
parent 7171511e
...@@ -389,7 +389,13 @@ static int ext4_alloc_branch(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, ...@@ -389,7 +389,13 @@ static int ext4_alloc_branch(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
return 0; return 0;
failed: failed:
for (; i >= 0; i--) { for (; i >= 0; i--) {
if (i != indirect_blks && branch[i].bh) /*
* We want to ext4_forget() only freshly allocated indirect
* blocks. Buffer for new_blocks[i-1] is at branch[i].bh and
* buffer at branch[0].bh is indirect block / inode already
* existing before ext4_alloc_branch() was called.
*/
if (i > 0 && i != indirect_blks && branch[i].bh)
ext4_forget(handle, 1, inode, branch[i].bh, ext4_forget(handle, 1, inode, branch[i].bh,
branch[i].bh->b_blocknr); branch[i].bh->b_blocknr);
ext4_free_blocks(handle, inode, NULL, new_blocks[i], ext4_free_blocks(handle, inode, NULL, new_blocks[i],
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment