Commit c83dcd05 authored by Ping-Ke Shih's avatar Ping-Ke Shih Committed by Kalle Valo

rtw89: pci: add a separate interrupt handler for low power mode

In lower power mode, there are very low amount of RX, and it must process
in a separated function instead of schedule_napi(), because the existing
napi_poll does many things to optimize performance, but not all registers
can access in low power mode. The simple way is to use threadfn to process
the simple thing.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPing-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220421120903.73715-5-pkshih@realtek.com
parent 83720268
...@@ -1420,7 +1420,10 @@ static void rtw89_core_rx_to_mac80211(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, ...@@ -1420,7 +1420,10 @@ static void rtw89_core_rx_to_mac80211(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
{ {
rtw89_core_hw_to_sband_rate(rx_status); rtw89_core_hw_to_sband_rate(rx_status);
rtw89_core_rx_stats(rtwdev, phy_ppdu, desc_info, skb_ppdu); rtw89_core_rx_stats(rtwdev, phy_ppdu, desc_info, skb_ppdu);
/* In low power mode, it does RX in thread context. */
local_bh_disable();
ieee80211_rx_napi(rtwdev->hw, NULL, skb_ppdu, &rtwdev->napi); ieee80211_rx_napi(rtwdev->hw, NULL, skb_ppdu, &rtwdev->napi);
local_bh_enable();
rtwdev->napi_budget_countdown--; rtwdev->napi_budget_countdown--;
} }
......
...@@ -713,6 +713,18 @@ static void rtw89_pci_ops_recovery_complete(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev) ...@@ -713,6 +713,18 @@ static void rtw89_pci_ops_recovery_complete(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtwpci->irq_lock, flags); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtwpci->irq_lock, flags);
} }
static void rtw89_pci_low_power_interrupt_handler(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
{
struct rtw89_pci *rtwpci = (struct rtw89_pci *)rtwdev->priv;
int budget = NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT;
/* To prevent RXQ get stuck due to run out of budget. */
rtwdev->napi_budget_countdown = budget;
rtw89_pci_poll_rpq_dma(rtwdev, rtwpci, budget);
rtw89_pci_poll_rxq_dma(rtwdev, rtwpci, budget);
}
static irqreturn_t rtw89_pci_interrupt_threadfn(int irq, void *dev) static irqreturn_t rtw89_pci_interrupt_threadfn(int irq, void *dev)
{ {
struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev = dev; struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev = dev;
...@@ -733,6 +745,11 @@ static irqreturn_t rtw89_pci_interrupt_threadfn(int irq, void *dev) ...@@ -733,6 +745,11 @@ static irqreturn_t rtw89_pci_interrupt_threadfn(int irq, void *dev)
if (unlikely(rtwpci->under_recovery)) if (unlikely(rtwpci->under_recovery))
return IRQ_HANDLED; return IRQ_HANDLED;
if (unlikely(rtwpci->low_power)) {
rtw89_pci_low_power_interrupt_handler(rtwdev);
goto enable_intr;
}
if (likely(rtwpci->running)) { if (likely(rtwpci->running)) {
local_bh_disable(); local_bh_disable();
napi_schedule(&rtwdev->napi); napi_schedule(&rtwdev->napi);
...@@ -740,6 +757,12 @@ static irqreturn_t rtw89_pci_interrupt_threadfn(int irq, void *dev) ...@@ -740,6 +757,12 @@ static irqreturn_t rtw89_pci_interrupt_threadfn(int irq, void *dev)
} }
return IRQ_HANDLED; return IRQ_HANDLED;
enable_intr:
spin_lock_irqsave(&rtwpci->irq_lock, flags);
rtw89_chip_enable_intr(rtwdev, rtwpci);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtwpci->irq_lock, flags);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
} }
static irqreturn_t rtw89_pci_interrupt_handler(int irq, void *dev) static irqreturn_t rtw89_pci_interrupt_handler(int irq, void *dev)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment