btrfs: use next_state instead of rb_next where we can
We can simplify a lot of these functions where we have to cycle through extent_state's by simply using next_state() instead of rb_next(). In many spots this allows us to do things like while (state) { /* whatever */ state = next_state(state); } instead of while (1) { state = rb_entry(n, struct extent_state, rb_node); n = rb_next(n); if (!n) break; } Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment