Commit cd9640a7 authored by Alex Elder's avatar Alex Elder

xfs: remove old vmap cache

Re-apply a commit that had been reverted due to regressions
that have since been fixed.

    Original commit: d2859751
    Author: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
    Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:40:44 +1100

    XFS's vmap batching simply defers a number (up to 64) of vunmaps,
    and keeps track of them in a list. To purge the batch, it just goes
    through the list and calls vunamp on each one. This is pretty poor:
    a global TLB flush is generally still performed on each vunmap, with
    the most expensive parts of the operation being the broadcast IPIs
    and locking involved in the SMP callouts, and the locking involved
    in the vmap management -- none of these are avoided by just batching
    up the calls. I'm actually surprised it ever made much difference.
    (Now that the lazy vmap allocator is upstream, this description is
    not quite right, but the vunmap batching still doesn't seem to do
    much).

    Rip all this logic out of XFS completely. I will improve vmap
    performance and scalability directly in subsequent patch.
Signed-off-by: default avatarNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>

The only change I made was to use the "new" xfs_buf_is_vmapped()
function in a place it had been open-coded in the original.
Modified-by: default avatarAlex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
parent 57d54889
...@@ -167,75 +167,6 @@ test_page_region( ...@@ -167,75 +167,6 @@ test_page_region(
return (mask && (page_private(page) & mask) == mask); return (mask && (page_private(page) & mask) == mask);
} }
/*
* Mapping of multi-page buffers into contiguous virtual space
*/
typedef struct a_list {
void *vm_addr;
struct a_list *next;
} a_list_t;
static a_list_t *as_free_head;
static int as_list_len;
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(as_lock);
/*
* Try to batch vunmaps because they are costly.
*/
STATIC void
free_address(
void *addr)
{
a_list_t *aentry;
#ifdef CONFIG_XEN
/*
* Xen needs to be able to make sure it can get an exclusive
* RO mapping of pages it wants to turn into a pagetable. If
* a newly allocated page is also still being vmap()ed by xfs,
* it will cause pagetable construction to fail. This is a
* quick workaround to always eagerly unmap pages so that Xen
* is happy.
*/
vunmap(addr);
return;
#endif
aentry = kmalloc(sizeof(a_list_t), GFP_NOWAIT);
if (likely(aentry)) {
spin_lock(&as_lock);
aentry->next = as_free_head;
aentry->vm_addr = addr;
as_free_head = aentry;
as_list_len++;
spin_unlock(&as_lock);
} else {
vunmap(addr);
}
}
STATIC void
purge_addresses(void)
{
a_list_t *aentry, *old;
if (as_free_head == NULL)
return;
spin_lock(&as_lock);
aentry = as_free_head;
as_free_head = NULL;
as_list_len = 0;
spin_unlock(&as_lock);
while ((old = aentry) != NULL) {
vunmap(aentry->vm_addr);
aentry = aentry->next;
kfree(old);
}
}
/* /*
* Internal xfs_buf_t object manipulation * Internal xfs_buf_t object manipulation
*/ */
...@@ -337,7 +268,7 @@ xfs_buf_free( ...@@ -337,7 +268,7 @@ xfs_buf_free(
uint i; uint i;
if (xfs_buf_is_vmapped(bp)) if (xfs_buf_is_vmapped(bp))
free_address(bp->b_addr - bp->b_offset); vunmap(bp->b_addr - bp->b_offset);
for (i = 0; i < bp->b_page_count; i++) { for (i = 0; i < bp->b_page_count; i++) {
struct page *page = bp->b_pages[i]; struct page *page = bp->b_pages[i];
...@@ -457,8 +388,6 @@ _xfs_buf_map_pages( ...@@ -457,8 +388,6 @@ _xfs_buf_map_pages(
bp->b_addr = page_address(bp->b_pages[0]) + bp->b_offset; bp->b_addr = page_address(bp->b_pages[0]) + bp->b_offset;
bp->b_flags |= XBF_MAPPED; bp->b_flags |= XBF_MAPPED;
} else if (flags & XBF_MAPPED) { } else if (flags & XBF_MAPPED) {
if (as_list_len > 64)
purge_addresses();
bp->b_addr = vmap(bp->b_pages, bp->b_page_count, bp->b_addr = vmap(bp->b_pages, bp->b_page_count,
VM_MAP, PAGE_KERNEL); VM_MAP, PAGE_KERNEL);
if (unlikely(bp->b_addr == NULL)) if (unlikely(bp->b_addr == NULL))
...@@ -1955,9 +1884,6 @@ xfsbufd( ...@@ -1955,9 +1884,6 @@ xfsbufd(
xfs_buf_iostrategy(bp); xfs_buf_iostrategy(bp);
count++; count++;
} }
if (as_list_len > 0)
purge_addresses();
if (count) if (count)
blk_run_address_space(target->bt_mapping); blk_run_address_space(target->bt_mapping);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment