um/ptrace: Fix the syscall number update after a ptrace
Update the syscall number after each PTRACE_SETREGS on ORIG_*AX. This is needed to get the potentially altered syscall number in the seccomp filters after RET_TRACE. This fix four seccomp_bpf tests: > [ RUN ] TRACE_syscall.skip_after_RET_TRACE > seccomp_bpf.c:1560:TRACE_syscall.skip_after_RET_TRACE:Expected -1 (18446744073709551615) == syscall(39) (26) > seccomp_bpf.c:1561:TRACE_syscall.skip_after_RET_TRACE:Expected 1 (1) == (*__errno_location ()) (22) > [ FAIL ] TRACE_syscall.skip_after_RET_TRACE > [ RUN ] TRACE_syscall.kill_after_RET_TRACE > TRACE_syscall.kill_after_RET_TRACE: Test exited normally instead of by signal (code: 1) > [ FAIL ] TRACE_syscall.kill_after_RET_TRACE > [ RUN ] TRACE_syscall.skip_after_ptrace > seccomp_bpf.c:1622:TRACE_syscall.skip_after_ptrace:Expected -1 (18446744073709551615) == syscall(39) (26) > seccomp_bpf.c:1623:TRACE_syscall.skip_after_ptrace:Expected 1 (1) == (*__errno_location ()) (22) > [ FAIL ] TRACE_syscall.skip_after_ptrace > [ RUN ] TRACE_syscall.kill_after_ptrace > TRACE_syscall.kill_after_ptrace: Test exited normally instead of by signal (code: 1) > [ FAIL ] TRACE_syscall.kill_after_ptrace Fixes: 26703c63 ("um/ptrace: run seccomp after ptrace") Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment