scripts/bpf_doc.py: update logic to not assume sequential enum values
Relax bpf_doc.py's expectation of all BPF_FUNC_xxx enumerators having sequential values increasing by one. Instead, only make sure that relative order of BPF helper descriptions in comments matches enumerators definitions order. Also additionally make sure that helper IDs are not duplicated. And also make sure that for cases when we have multiple descriptions for the same BPF helper (e.g., for bpf_get_socket_cookie()), all such descriptions are grouped together. Such checks should capture all the same (and more) issues in upstream UAPI headers, but also handle backported kernels correctly. Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221006042452.2089843-2-andrii@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment