Commit d7921bb5 authored by Vasily Averin's avatar Vasily Averin Committed by Chris Wright

[PATCH] NET: "wrong timeout value" in sk_wait_data() v2

sys_setsockopt() do not check properly timeout values for
SO_RCVTIMEO/SO_SNDTIMEO, for example it's possible to set negative timeout
values. POSIX do not defines behaviour for sys_setsockopt in case negative
timeouts, but requires that setsockopt() shall fail with -EDOM if the send and
receive timeout values are too big to fit into the timeout fields in the socket
structure.
In current implementation negative timeout can lead to error messages like
"schedule_timeout: wrong timeout value".

Proposed patch:
- checks tv_usec and returns -EDOM if it is wrong
- do not allows to set negative timeout values (sets 0 instead) and outputs
ratelimited information message about such attempts.
Signed-off-By: default avatarVasily Averin <vvs@sw.ru>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
parent bd636357
...@@ -204,7 +204,19 @@ static int sock_set_timeout(long *timeo_p, char __user *optval, int optlen) ...@@ -204,7 +204,19 @@ static int sock_set_timeout(long *timeo_p, char __user *optval, int optlen)
return -EINVAL; return -EINVAL;
if (copy_from_user(&tv, optval, sizeof(tv))) if (copy_from_user(&tv, optval, sizeof(tv)))
return -EFAULT; return -EFAULT;
if (tv.tv_usec < 0 || tv.tv_usec >= USEC_PER_SEC)
return -EDOM;
if (tv.tv_sec < 0) {
static int warned = 0;
*timeo_p = 0;
if (warned < 10 && net_ratelimit())
warned++;
printk(KERN_INFO "sock_set_timeout: `%s' (pid %d) "
"tries to set negative timeout\n",
current->comm, current->pid);
return 0;
}
*timeo_p = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT; *timeo_p = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
if (tv.tv_sec == 0 && tv.tv_usec == 0) if (tv.tv_sec == 0 && tv.tv_usec == 0)
return 0; return 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment