Commit d7f69466 authored by Alexey Dobriyan's avatar Alexey Dobriyan Committed by Steffen Klassert

xfrm: use "unsigned int" in __xfrm6_pref_hash()

x86_64 is zero-extending arch so "unsigned int" is preferred over "int"
for address calculations.

Space savings:

	add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/3 up/down: 0/-58 (-58)
	function                                     old     new   delta
	xfrm_hash_resize                            2752    2743      -9
	policy_hash_bysel                            985     973     -12
	policy_hash_direct                          1036     999     -37
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
parent 15608756
...@@ -54,8 +54,8 @@ static inline unsigned int __xfrm4_dpref_spref_hash(const xfrm_address_t *daddr, ...@@ -54,8 +54,8 @@ static inline unsigned int __xfrm4_dpref_spref_hash(const xfrm_address_t *daddr,
static inline unsigned int __xfrm6_pref_hash(const xfrm_address_t *addr, static inline unsigned int __xfrm6_pref_hash(const xfrm_address_t *addr,
__u8 prefixlen) __u8 prefixlen)
{ {
int pdw; unsigned int pdw;
int pbi; unsigned int pbi;
u32 initval = 0; u32 initval = 0;
pdw = prefixlen >> 5; /* num of whole u32 in prefix */ pdw = prefixlen >> 5; /* num of whole u32 in prefix */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment