Commit d85be8a4 authored by Mathieu Desnoyers's avatar Mathieu Desnoyers Committed by Michael Ellerman

powerpc: Fix incorrect stw{, ux, u, x} instructions in __set_pte_at

The placeholder for instruction selection should use the second
argument's operand, which is %1, not %0. This could generate incorrect
assembly code if the memory addressing of operand %0 is a different
form from that of operand %1.

Also remove the %Un placeholder because having %Un placeholders
for two operands which are based on the same local var (ptep) doesn't
make much sense. By the way, it doesn't change the current behaviour
because "<>" constraint is missing for the associated "=m".

[chleroy: revised commit log iaw segher's comments and removed %U0]

Fixes: 9bf2b5cd ("powerpc: Fixes for CONFIG_PTE_64BIT for SMP support")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v2.6.28+
Signed-off-by: default avatarMathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Acked-by: default avatarSegher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/96354bd77977a6a933fe9020da57629007fdb920.1603358942.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
parent 7c6c86b3
......@@ -522,9 +522,9 @@ static inline void __set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
if (pte_val(*ptep) & _PAGE_HASHPTE)
flush_hash_entry(mm, ptep, addr);
__asm__ __volatile__("\
stw%U0%X0 %2,%0\n\
stw%X0 %2,%0\n\
eieio\n\
stw%U0%X0 %L2,%1"
stw%X1 %L2,%1"
: "=m" (*ptep), "=m" (*((unsigned char *)ptep+4))
: "r" (pte) : "memory");
......
......@@ -192,9 +192,9 @@ static inline void __set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
*/
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC32) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PTE_64BIT) && !percpu) {
__asm__ __volatile__("\
stw%U0%X0 %2,%0\n\
stw%X0 %2,%0\n\
eieio\n\
stw%U0%X0 %L2,%1"
stw%X1 %L2,%1"
: "=m" (*ptep), "=m" (*((unsigned char *)ptep+4))
: "r" (pte) : "memory");
return;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment