Commit da2c398e authored by Vladimir Oltean's avatar Vladimir Oltean Committed by Jakub Kicinski

net: dsa: avoid dsa_port_link_{,un}register_of() calls with platform data

dsa_port_link_register_of() and dsa_port_link_unregister_of() are not
written with the fact in mind that they can be called with a dp->dn that
is NULL (as evidenced even by the _of suffix in their name), but this is
exactly what happens.

How this behaves will differ depending on whether the backing driver
implements ->adjust_link() or not.

If it doesn't, the "if (of_phy_is_fixed_link(dp->dn) || phy_np)"
condition will return false, and dsa_port_link_register_of() will do
nothing and return 0.

If the driver does implement ->adjust_link(), the
"if (of_phy_is_fixed_link(dp->dn))" condition will return false
(dp->dn is NULL) and we will call dsa_port_setup_phy_of(). This will
call dsa_port_get_phy_device(), which will also return NULL, and we will
also do nothing and return 0.

It is hard to maintain this code and make future changes to it in this
state, so just suppress calls to these 2 functions if dp->dn is NULL.
The only functional effect is that if the driver does implement
->adjust_link(), we'll stop printing this to the console:

Using legacy PHYLIB callbacks. Please migrate to PHYLINK!

but instead we'll always print:

[    8.539848] dsa-loop fixed-0:1f: skipping link registration for CPU port 5

This is for the better anyway, since "using legacy phylib callbacks"
was misleading information - we weren't issuing _any_ callbacks due to
dsa_port_get_phy_device() returning NULL.
Signed-off-by: default avatarVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
parent df55e317
...@@ -469,10 +469,16 @@ static int dsa_port_setup(struct dsa_port *dp) ...@@ -469,10 +469,16 @@ static int dsa_port_setup(struct dsa_port *dp)
dsa_port_disable(dp); dsa_port_disable(dp);
break; break;
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_CPU: case DSA_PORT_TYPE_CPU:
if (dp->dn) {
err = dsa_port_link_register_of(dp); err = dsa_port_link_register_of(dp);
if (err) if (err)
break; break;
dsa_port_link_registered = true; dsa_port_link_registered = true;
} else {
dev_warn(ds->dev,
"skipping link registration for CPU port %d\n",
dp->index);
}
err = dsa_port_enable(dp, NULL); err = dsa_port_enable(dp, NULL);
if (err) if (err)
...@@ -481,10 +487,16 @@ static int dsa_port_setup(struct dsa_port *dp) ...@@ -481,10 +487,16 @@ static int dsa_port_setup(struct dsa_port *dp)
break; break;
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_DSA: case DSA_PORT_TYPE_DSA:
if (dp->dn) {
err = dsa_port_link_register_of(dp); err = dsa_port_link_register_of(dp);
if (err) if (err)
break; break;
dsa_port_link_registered = true; dsa_port_link_registered = true;
} else {
dev_warn(ds->dev,
"skipping link registration for DSA port %d\n",
dp->index);
}
err = dsa_port_enable(dp, NULL); err = dsa_port_enable(dp, NULL);
if (err) if (err)
...@@ -577,10 +589,12 @@ static void dsa_port_teardown(struct dsa_port *dp) ...@@ -577,10 +589,12 @@ static void dsa_port_teardown(struct dsa_port *dp)
break; break;
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_CPU: case DSA_PORT_TYPE_CPU:
dsa_port_disable(dp); dsa_port_disable(dp);
if (dp->dn)
dsa_port_link_unregister_of(dp); dsa_port_link_unregister_of(dp);
break; break;
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_DSA: case DSA_PORT_TYPE_DSA:
dsa_port_disable(dp); dsa_port_disable(dp);
if (dp->dn)
dsa_port_link_unregister_of(dp); dsa_port_link_unregister_of(dp);
break; break;
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER: case DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment