Commit dbec2800 authored by Nico Boehr's avatar Nico Boehr Committed by Janosch Frank

s390/vfio-ap: GISA: sort out physical vs virtual pointers usage

Fix virtual vs physical address confusion (which currently are the same)
for the GISA when enabling the IRQ.
Signed-off-by: default avatarNico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarHalil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarClaudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118100429.70453-1-nrb@linux.ibm.com
Message-Id: <20221118100429.70453-1-nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJanosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
parent cc726886
...@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static struct ap_queue_status vfio_ap_irq_enable(struct vfio_ap_queue *q, ...@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static struct ap_queue_status vfio_ap_irq_enable(struct vfio_ap_queue *q,
aqic_gisa.isc = nisc; aqic_gisa.isc = nisc;
aqic_gisa.ir = 1; aqic_gisa.ir = 1;
aqic_gisa.gisa = (uint64_t)gisa >> 4; aqic_gisa.gisa = virt_to_phys(gisa) >> 4;
status = ap_aqic(q->apqn, aqic_gisa, h_nib); status = ap_aqic(q->apqn, aqic_gisa, h_nib);
switch (status.response_code) { switch (status.response_code) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment