Commit de16b91e authored by Byungchul Park's avatar Byungchul Park Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched/rt: Remove unnecessary condition in push_rt_task()

pick_next_pushable_task(rq) has BUG_ON(rq_cpu != task_cpu(task)) when
it returns a task other than NULL, which means that task_cpu(task) must
be rq->cpu. So if task == next_task, then task_cpu(next_task) must be
rq->cpu as well. Remove the redundant condition and make the code simpler.

This way one unnecessary branch and two LOAD operations can be avoided.
Signed-off-by: default avatarByungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarSteven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDaniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: <kernel-team@lge.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1494551143-22219-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.comSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 73215849
...@@ -1819,7 +1819,7 @@ static int push_rt_task(struct rq *rq) ...@@ -1819,7 +1819,7 @@ static int push_rt_task(struct rq *rq)
* pushing. * pushing.
*/ */
task = pick_next_pushable_task(rq); task = pick_next_pushable_task(rq);
if (task_cpu(next_task) == rq->cpu && task == next_task) { if (task == next_task) {
/* /*
* The task hasn't migrated, and is still the next * The task hasn't migrated, and is still the next
* eligible task, but we failed to find a run-queue * eligible task, but we failed to find a run-queue
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment