Commit dea5c24a authored by Rui Salvaterra's avatar Rui Salvaterra Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

lib: lz4: cleanup unaligned access efficiency detection

These identifiers are bogus. The interested architectures should define
HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS whenever relevant to do so. If this
isn't true for some arch, it should be fixed in the arch definition.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRui Salvaterra <rsalvaterra@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 3e26a691
...@@ -24,9 +24,7 @@ ...@@ -24,9 +24,7 @@
typedef struct _U16_S { u16 v; } U16_S; typedef struct _U16_S { u16 v; } U16_S;
typedef struct _U32_S { u32 v; } U32_S; typedef struct _U32_S { u32 v; } U32_S;
typedef struct _U64_S { u64 v; } U64_S; typedef struct _U64_S { u64 v; } U64_S;
#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) \ #if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
|| defined(CONFIG_ARM) && __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 6 \
&& defined(ARM_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
#define A16(x) (((U16_S *)(x))->v) #define A16(x) (((U16_S *)(x))->v)
#define A32(x) (((U32_S *)(x))->v) #define A32(x) (((U32_S *)(x))->v)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment