vmstat: fix dirty threshold ordering
The nr_dirty_[background_]threshold fields are misplaced before the numa_* fields, and users will read strange values. This is the right order. Before patch, nr_dirty_background_threshold will read as 0 (the value from numa_miss). numa_hit 128501 numa_miss 0 numa_foreign 0 numa_interleave 7388 numa_local 128501 numa_other 0 nr_dirty_threshold 144291 nr_dirty_background_threshold 72145 Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com> Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment