Commit e1d227a4 authored by Mark Fasheh's avatar Mark Fasheh Committed by Chris Mason

btrfs: Handle unaligned length in extent_same

The extent-same code rejects requests with an unaligned length. This
poses a problem when we want to dedupe the tail extent of files as we
skip cloning the portion between i_size and the extent boundary.

If we don't clone the entire extent, it won't be deleted. So the
combination of these behaviors winds up giving us worst-case dedupe on
many files.

We can fix this by allowing a length that extents to i_size and
internally aligining those to the end of the block. This is what
btrfs_ioctl_clone() so we can just copy that check over.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
parent 070034bd
...@@ -2889,12 +2889,19 @@ static int btrfs_cmp_data(struct inode *src, u64 loff, struct inode *dst, ...@@ -2889,12 +2889,19 @@ static int btrfs_cmp_data(struct inode *src, u64 loff, struct inode *dst,
return ret; return ret;
} }
static int extent_same_check_offsets(struct inode *inode, u64 off, u64 len) static int extent_same_check_offsets(struct inode *inode, u64 off, u64 *plen,
u64 olen)
{ {
u64 len = *plen;
u64 bs = BTRFS_I(inode)->root->fs_info->sb->s_blocksize; u64 bs = BTRFS_I(inode)->root->fs_info->sb->s_blocksize;
if (off + len > inode->i_size || off + len < off) if (off + olen > inode->i_size || off + olen < off)
return -EINVAL; return -EINVAL;
/* if we extend to eof, continue to block boundary */
if (off + len == inode->i_size)
*plen = len = ALIGN(inode->i_size, bs) - off;
/* Check that we are block aligned - btrfs_clone() requires this */ /* Check that we are block aligned - btrfs_clone() requires this */
if (!IS_ALIGNED(off, bs) || !IS_ALIGNED(off + len, bs)) if (!IS_ALIGNED(off, bs) || !IS_ALIGNED(off + len, bs))
return -EINVAL; return -EINVAL;
...@@ -2902,10 +2909,11 @@ static int extent_same_check_offsets(struct inode *inode, u64 off, u64 len) ...@@ -2902,10 +2909,11 @@ static int extent_same_check_offsets(struct inode *inode, u64 off, u64 len)
return 0; return 0;
} }
static int btrfs_extent_same(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 len, static int btrfs_extent_same(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 olen,
struct inode *dst, u64 dst_loff) struct inode *dst, u64 dst_loff)
{ {
int ret; int ret;
u64 len = olen;
/* /*
* btrfs_clone() can't handle extents in the same file * btrfs_clone() can't handle extents in the same file
...@@ -2920,11 +2928,11 @@ static int btrfs_extent_same(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 len, ...@@ -2920,11 +2928,11 @@ static int btrfs_extent_same(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 len,
btrfs_double_lock(src, loff, dst, dst_loff, len); btrfs_double_lock(src, loff, dst, dst_loff, len);
ret = extent_same_check_offsets(src, loff, len); ret = extent_same_check_offsets(src, loff, &len, olen);
if (ret) if (ret)
goto out_unlock; goto out_unlock;
ret = extent_same_check_offsets(dst, dst_loff, len); ret = extent_same_check_offsets(dst, dst_loff, &len, olen);
if (ret) if (ret)
goto out_unlock; goto out_unlock;
...@@ -2937,7 +2945,7 @@ static int btrfs_extent_same(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 len, ...@@ -2937,7 +2945,7 @@ static int btrfs_extent_same(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 len,
ret = btrfs_cmp_data(src, loff, dst, dst_loff, len); ret = btrfs_cmp_data(src, loff, dst, dst_loff, len);
if (ret == 0) if (ret == 0)
ret = btrfs_clone(src, dst, loff, len, len, dst_loff); ret = btrfs_clone(src, dst, loff, olen, len, dst_loff);
out_unlock: out_unlock:
btrfs_double_unlock(src, loff, dst, dst_loff, len); btrfs_double_unlock(src, loff, dst, dst_loff, len);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment