Commit e1f1dea9 authored by Jia-Ju Bai's avatar Jia-Ju Bai Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

net: caif: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in cfpkt_create_pfx


[ Upstream commit f146e872 ]

The kernel may sleep under a rcu read lock in cfpkt_create_pfx, and the
function call path is:
cfcnfg_linkup_rsp (acquire the lock by rcu_read_lock)
  cfctrl_linkdown_req
    cfpkt_create
      cfpkt_create_pfx
        alloc_skb(GFP_KERNEL) --> may sleep
cfserl_receive (acquire the lock by rcu_read_lock)
  cfpkt_split
    cfpkt_create_pfx
      alloc_skb(GFP_KERNEL) --> may sleep

There is "in_interrupt" in cfpkt_create_pfx to decide use "GFP_KERNEL" or
"GFP_ATOMIC". In this situation, "GFP_KERNEL" is used because the function
is called under a rcu read lock, instead in interrupt.

To fix it, only "GFP_ATOMIC" is used in cfpkt_create_pfx.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@163.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 721ee8db
...@@ -81,11 +81,7 @@ static struct cfpkt *cfpkt_create_pfx(u16 len, u16 pfx) ...@@ -81,11 +81,7 @@ static struct cfpkt *cfpkt_create_pfx(u16 len, u16 pfx)
{ {
struct sk_buff *skb; struct sk_buff *skb;
if (likely(in_interrupt()))
skb = alloc_skb(len + pfx, GFP_ATOMIC); skb = alloc_skb(len + pfx, GFP_ATOMIC);
else
skb = alloc_skb(len + pfx, GFP_KERNEL);
if (unlikely(skb == NULL)) if (unlikely(skb == NULL))
return NULL; return NULL;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment