Commit e2ac579a authored by David Miller's avatar David Miller Committed by Alexei Starovoitov

sparc: Correct ctx->saw_frame_pointer logic.

We need to initialize the frame pointer register not just if it is
seen as a source operand, but also if it is seen as the destination
operand of a store or an atomic instruction (which effectively is a
source operand).

This is exercised by test_verifier's "non-invalid fp arithmetic"
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
parent c44768a3
......@@ -1270,6 +1270,9 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
const u8 tmp2 = bpf2sparc[TMP_REG_2];
u32 opcode = 0, rs2;
if (insn->dst_reg == BPF_REG_FP)
ctx->saw_frame_pointer = true;
ctx->tmp_2_used = true;
emit_loadimm(imm, tmp2, ctx);
......@@ -1308,6 +1311,9 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
const u8 tmp = bpf2sparc[TMP_REG_1];
u32 opcode = 0, rs2;
if (insn->dst_reg == BPF_REG_FP)
ctx->saw_frame_pointer = true;
switch (BPF_SIZE(code)) {
case BPF_W:
opcode = ST32;
......@@ -1340,6 +1346,9 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
const u8 tmp2 = bpf2sparc[TMP_REG_2];
const u8 tmp3 = bpf2sparc[TMP_REG_3];
if (insn->dst_reg == BPF_REG_FP)
ctx->saw_frame_pointer = true;
ctx->tmp_1_used = true;
ctx->tmp_2_used = true;
ctx->tmp_3_used = true;
......@@ -1360,6 +1369,9 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
const u8 tmp2 = bpf2sparc[TMP_REG_2];
const u8 tmp3 = bpf2sparc[TMP_REG_3];
if (insn->dst_reg == BPF_REG_FP)
ctx->saw_frame_pointer = true;
ctx->tmp_1_used = true;
ctx->tmp_2_used = true;
ctx->tmp_3_used = true;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment