Commit e383e16e authored by Christoph Hellwig's avatar Christoph Hellwig Committed by Martin K. Petersen

scsi: sd: Remove WRITE_SAME support

There are no more end-users of REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME left, so we can start
deleting it.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220209082828.2629273-5-hch@lst.deReviewed-by: default avatarChaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
parent ebd04737
......@@ -1035,13 +1035,13 @@ static void sd_config_write_same(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)
* Reporting a maximum number of blocks that is not aligned
* on the device physical size would cause a large write same
* request to be split into physically unaligned chunks by
* __blkdev_issue_write_zeroes() and __blkdev_issue_write_same()
* even if the caller of these functions took care to align the
* large request. So make sure the maximum reported is aligned
* to the device physical block size. This is only an optional
* optimization for regular disks, but this is mandatory to
* avoid failure of large write same requests directed at
* sequential write required zones of host-managed ZBC disks.
* __blkdev_issue_write_zeroes() even if the caller of this
* functions took care to align the large request. So make sure
* the maximum reported is aligned to the device physical block
* size. This is only an optional optimization for regular
* disks, but this is mandatory to avoid failure of large write
* same requests directed at sequential write required zones of
* host-managed ZBC disks.
*/
sdkp->max_ws_blocks =
round_down(sdkp->max_ws_blocks,
......@@ -1050,68 +1050,10 @@ static void sd_config_write_same(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)
}
out:
blk_queue_max_write_same_sectors(q, sdkp->max_ws_blocks *
(logical_block_size >> 9));
blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, sdkp->max_ws_blocks *
(logical_block_size >> 9));
}
/**
* sd_setup_write_same_cmnd - write the same data to multiple blocks
* @cmd: command to prepare
*
* Will set up either WRITE SAME(10) or WRITE SAME(16) depending on
* the preference indicated by the target device.
**/
static blk_status_t sd_setup_write_same_cmnd(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
{
struct request *rq = scsi_cmd_to_rq(cmd);
struct scsi_device *sdp = cmd->device;
struct scsi_disk *sdkp = scsi_disk(rq->q->disk);
struct bio *bio = rq->bio;
u64 lba = sectors_to_logical(sdp, blk_rq_pos(rq));
u32 nr_blocks = sectors_to_logical(sdp, blk_rq_sectors(rq));
blk_status_t ret;
if (sdkp->device->no_write_same)
return BLK_STS_TARGET;
BUG_ON(bio_offset(bio) || bio_iovec(bio).bv_len != sdp->sector_size);
rq->timeout = SD_WRITE_SAME_TIMEOUT;
if (sdkp->ws16 || lba > 0xffffffff || nr_blocks > 0xffff) {
cmd->cmd_len = 16;
cmd->cmnd[0] = WRITE_SAME_16;
put_unaligned_be64(lba, &cmd->cmnd[2]);
put_unaligned_be32(nr_blocks, &cmd->cmnd[10]);
} else {
cmd->cmd_len = 10;
cmd->cmnd[0] = WRITE_SAME;
put_unaligned_be32(lba, &cmd->cmnd[2]);
put_unaligned_be16(nr_blocks, &cmd->cmnd[7]);
}
cmd->transfersize = sdp->sector_size;
cmd->allowed = sdkp->max_retries;
/*
* For WRITE SAME the data transferred via the DATA OUT buffer is
* different from the amount of data actually written to the target.
*
* We set up __data_len to the amount of data transferred via the
* DATA OUT buffer so that blk_rq_map_sg sets up the proper S/G list
* to transfer a single sector of data first, but then reset it to
* the amount of data to be written right after so that the I/O path
* knows how much to actually write.
*/
rq->__data_len = sdp->sector_size;
ret = scsi_alloc_sgtables(cmd);
rq->__data_len = blk_rq_bytes(rq);
return ret;
}
static blk_status_t sd_setup_flush_cmnd(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
{
struct request *rq = scsi_cmd_to_rq(cmd);
......@@ -1344,8 +1286,6 @@ static blk_status_t sd_init_command(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
}
case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
return sd_setup_write_zeroes_cmnd(cmd);
case REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME:
return sd_setup_write_same_cmnd(cmd);
case REQ_OP_FLUSH:
return sd_setup_flush_cmnd(cmd);
case REQ_OP_READ:
......@@ -2040,7 +1980,6 @@ static int sd_done(struct scsi_cmnd *SCpnt)
switch (req_op(req)) {
case REQ_OP_DISCARD:
case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
case REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME:
case REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET:
case REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL:
case REQ_OP_ZONE_OPEN:
......
......@@ -423,7 +423,6 @@ static bool sd_zbc_need_zone_wp_update(struct request *rq)
return true;
case REQ_OP_WRITE:
case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
case REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME:
return blk_rq_zone_is_seq(rq);
default:
return false;
......@@ -477,7 +476,6 @@ static unsigned int sd_zbc_zone_wp_update(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd,
rq->__sector += sdkp->zones_wp_offset[zno];
fallthrough;
case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
case REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME:
case REQ_OP_WRITE:
if (sdkp->zones_wp_offset[zno] < sd_zbc_zone_sectors(sdkp))
sdkp->zones_wp_offset[zno] +=
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment