Commit e3f2c4a3 authored by Soheil Hassas Yeganeh's avatar Soheil Hassas Yeganeh Committed by David S. Miller

ip: do not set RFS core on error queue reads

We should only record RPS on normal reads and writes.
In single threaded processes, all calls record the same state. In
multi-threaded processes where a separate thread processes
errors, the RFS table mispredicts.

Note that, when CONFIG_RPS is disabled, sock_rps_record_flow
is a noop and no branch is added as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSoheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarWillem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 2e40b823
...@@ -790,7 +790,8 @@ int inet_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size, ...@@ -790,7 +790,8 @@ int inet_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size,
int addr_len = 0; int addr_len = 0;
int err; int err;
sock_rps_record_flow(sk); if (likely(!(flags & MSG_ERRQUEUE)))
sock_rps_record_flow(sk);
err = sk->sk_prot->recvmsg(sk, msg, size, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, err = sk->sk_prot->recvmsg(sk, msg, size, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT,
flags & ~MSG_DONTWAIT, &addr_len); flags & ~MSG_DONTWAIT, &addr_len);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment