Commit e4aa7f88 authored by Chao Gao's avatar Chao Gao Committed by Paolo Bonzini

KVM: Disable CPU hotplug during hardware enabling/disabling

Disable CPU hotplug when enabling/disabling hardware to prevent the
corner case where if the following sequence occurs:

  1. A hotplugged CPU marks itself online in cpu_online_mask
  2. The hotplugged CPU enables interrupt before invoking KVM's ONLINE
     callback
  3  hardware_{en,dis}able_all() is invoked on another CPU

the hotplugged CPU will be included in on_each_cpu() and thus get sent
through hardware_{en,dis}able_nolock() before kvm_online_cpu() is called.

        start_secondary { ...
                set_cpu_online(smp_processor_id(), true); <- 1
                ...
                local_irq_enable();  <- 2
                ...
                cpu_startup_entry(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE); <- 3
        }

KVM currently fudges around this race by keeping track of which CPUs have
done hardware enabling (see commit 1b6c0168 "KVM: Keep track of which
cpus have virtualization enabled"), but that's an inefficient, convoluted,
and hacky solution.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
[sean: split to separate patch, write changelog]
Signed-off-by: default avatarSean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Message-Id: <20221130230934.1014142-43-seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
parent aaf12a7b
...@@ -9296,7 +9296,16 @@ static inline void kvm_ops_update(struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops) ...@@ -9296,7 +9296,16 @@ static inline void kvm_ops_update(struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops)
static int kvm_x86_check_processor_compatibility(void) static int kvm_x86_check_processor_compatibility(void)
{ {
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(smp_processor_id()); int cpu = smp_processor_id();
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
/*
* Compatibility checks are done when loading KVM and when enabling
* hardware, e.g. during CPU hotplug, to ensure all online CPUs are
* compatible, i.e. KVM should never perform a compatibility check on
* an offline CPU.
*/
WARN_ON(!cpu_online(cpu));
if (__cr4_reserved_bits(cpu_has, c) != if (__cr4_reserved_bits(cpu_has, c) !=
__cr4_reserved_bits(cpu_has, &boot_cpu_data)) __cr4_reserved_bits(cpu_has, &boot_cpu_data))
......
...@@ -5167,15 +5167,26 @@ static void hardware_disable_all_nolock(void) ...@@ -5167,15 +5167,26 @@ static void hardware_disable_all_nolock(void)
static void hardware_disable_all(void) static void hardware_disable_all(void)
{ {
cpus_read_lock();
raw_spin_lock(&kvm_count_lock); raw_spin_lock(&kvm_count_lock);
hardware_disable_all_nolock(); hardware_disable_all_nolock();
raw_spin_unlock(&kvm_count_lock); raw_spin_unlock(&kvm_count_lock);
cpus_read_unlock();
} }
static int hardware_enable_all(void) static int hardware_enable_all(void)
{ {
int r = 0; int r = 0;
/*
* When onlining a CPU, cpu_online_mask is set before kvm_online_cpu()
* is called, and so on_each_cpu() between them includes the CPU that
* is being onlined. As a result, hardware_enable_nolock() may get
* invoked before kvm_online_cpu(), which also enables hardware if the
* usage count is non-zero. Disable CPU hotplug to avoid attempting to
* enable hardware multiple times.
*/
cpus_read_lock();
raw_spin_lock(&kvm_count_lock); raw_spin_lock(&kvm_count_lock);
kvm_usage_count++; kvm_usage_count++;
...@@ -5190,6 +5201,7 @@ static int hardware_enable_all(void) ...@@ -5190,6 +5201,7 @@ static int hardware_enable_all(void)
} }
raw_spin_unlock(&kvm_count_lock); raw_spin_unlock(&kvm_count_lock);
cpus_read_unlock();
return r; return r;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment