Commit e53bcffa authored by Darrick J. Wong's avatar Darrick J. Wong

xfs: don't hold xattr leaf buffers across transaction rolls

Now that we've established (again!) that empty xattr leaf buffers are
ok, we no longer need to bhold them to transactions when we're creating
new leaf blocks.  Get rid of the entire mechanism, which should simplify
the xattr code quite a bit.

The original justification for using bhold here was to prevent the AIL
from trying to write the empty leaf block into the fs during the brief
time that we release the buffer lock.  The reason for /that/ was to
prevent recovery from tripping over the empty ondisk block.
Reviewed-by: default avatarDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
parent 7be3bd88
......@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ STATIC int xfs_attr_shortform_addname(xfs_da_args_t *args);
STATIC int xfs_attr_leaf_get(xfs_da_args_t *args);
STATIC int xfs_attr_leaf_removename(xfs_da_args_t *args);
STATIC int xfs_attr_leaf_hasname(struct xfs_da_args *args, struct xfs_buf **bp);
STATIC int xfs_attr_leaf_try_add(struct xfs_da_args *args, struct xfs_buf *bp);
STATIC int xfs_attr_leaf_try_add(struct xfs_da_args *args);
/*
* Internal routines when attribute list is more than one block.
......@@ -393,16 +393,10 @@ xfs_attr_sf_addname(
* It won't fit in the shortform, transform to a leaf block. GROT:
* another possible req'mt for a double-split btree op.
*/
error = xfs_attr_shortform_to_leaf(args, &attr->xattri_leaf_bp);
error = xfs_attr_shortform_to_leaf(args);
if (error)
return error;
/*
* Prevent the leaf buffer from being unlocked so that a concurrent AIL
* push cannot grab the half-baked leaf buffer and run into problems
* with the write verifier.
*/
xfs_trans_bhold(args->trans, attr->xattri_leaf_bp);
attr->xattri_dela_state = XFS_DAS_LEAF_ADD;
out:
trace_xfs_attr_sf_addname_return(attr->xattri_dela_state, args->dp);
......@@ -447,11 +441,9 @@ xfs_attr_leaf_addname(
/*
* Use the leaf buffer we may already hold locked as a result of
* a sf-to-leaf conversion. The held buffer is no longer valid
* after this call, regardless of the result.
* a sf-to-leaf conversion.
*/
error = xfs_attr_leaf_try_add(args, attr->xattri_leaf_bp);
attr->xattri_leaf_bp = NULL;
error = xfs_attr_leaf_try_add(args);
if (error == -ENOSPC) {
error = xfs_attr3_leaf_to_node(args);
......@@ -497,8 +489,6 @@ xfs_attr_node_addname(
struct xfs_da_args *args = attr->xattri_da_args;
int error;
ASSERT(!attr->xattri_leaf_bp);
error = xfs_attr_node_addname_find_attr(attr);
if (error)
return error;
......@@ -1215,24 +1205,14 @@ xfs_attr_restore_rmt_blk(
*/
STATIC int
xfs_attr_leaf_try_add(
struct xfs_da_args *args,
struct xfs_buf *bp)
struct xfs_da_args *args)
{
struct xfs_buf *bp;
int error;
/*
* If the caller provided a buffer to us, it is locked and held in
* the transaction because it just did a shortform to leaf conversion.
* Hence we don't need to read it again. Otherwise read in the leaf
* buffer.
*/
if (bp) {
xfs_trans_bhold_release(args->trans, bp);
} else {
error = xfs_attr3_leaf_read(args->trans, args->dp, 0, &bp);
if (error)
return error;
}
error = xfs_attr3_leaf_read(args->trans, args->dp, 0, &bp);
if (error)
return error;
/*
* Look up the xattr name to set the insertion point for the new xattr.
......
......@@ -515,11 +515,6 @@ struct xfs_attr_intent {
*/
struct xfs_attri_log_nameval *xattri_nameval;
/*
* Used by xfs_attr_set to hold a leaf buffer across a transaction roll
*/
struct xfs_buf *xattri_leaf_bp;
/* Used to keep track of current state of delayed operation */
enum xfs_delattr_state xattri_dela_state;
......
......@@ -930,14 +930,10 @@ xfs_attr_shortform_getvalue(
return -ENOATTR;
}
/*
* Convert from using the shortform to the leaf. On success, return the
* buffer so that we can keep it locked until we're totally done with it.
*/
/* Convert from using the shortform to the leaf format. */
int
xfs_attr_shortform_to_leaf(
struct xfs_da_args *args,
struct xfs_buf **leaf_bp)
struct xfs_da_args *args)
{
struct xfs_inode *dp;
struct xfs_attr_shortform *sf;
......@@ -999,7 +995,6 @@ xfs_attr_shortform_to_leaf(
sfe = xfs_attr_sf_nextentry(sfe);
}
error = 0;
*leaf_bp = bp;
out:
kmem_free(tmpbuffer);
return error;
......
......@@ -49,8 +49,7 @@ void xfs_attr_shortform_create(struct xfs_da_args *args);
void xfs_attr_shortform_add(struct xfs_da_args *args, int forkoff);
int xfs_attr_shortform_lookup(struct xfs_da_args *args);
int xfs_attr_shortform_getvalue(struct xfs_da_args *args);
int xfs_attr_shortform_to_leaf(struct xfs_da_args *args,
struct xfs_buf **leaf_bp);
int xfs_attr_shortform_to_leaf(struct xfs_da_args *args);
int xfs_attr_sf_removename(struct xfs_da_args *args);
int xfs_attr_sf_findname(struct xfs_da_args *args,
struct xfs_attr_sf_entry **sfep,
......
......@@ -455,8 +455,6 @@ static inline void
xfs_attr_free_item(
struct xfs_attr_intent *attr)
{
ASSERT(attr->xattri_leaf_bp == NULL);
if (attr->xattri_da_state)
xfs_da_state_free(attr->xattri_da_state);
xfs_attri_log_nameval_put(attr->xattri_nameval);
......@@ -511,10 +509,6 @@ xfs_attr_cancel_item(
struct xfs_attr_intent *attr;
attr = container_of(item, struct xfs_attr_intent, xattri_list);
if (attr->xattri_leaf_bp) {
xfs_buf_relse(attr->xattri_leaf_bp);
attr->xattri_leaf_bp = NULL;
}
xfs_attr_free_item(attr);
}
......@@ -672,16 +666,6 @@ xfs_attri_item_recover(
if (error)
goto out_unlock;
/*
* The defer capture structure took its own reference to the
* attr leaf buffer and will give that to the continuation
* transaction. The attr intent struct drives the continuation
* work, so release our refcount on the attr leaf buffer but
* retain the pointer in the intent structure.
*/
if (attr->xattri_leaf_bp)
xfs_buf_relse(attr->xattri_leaf_bp);
xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
xfs_irele(ip);
return 0;
......@@ -692,13 +676,7 @@ xfs_attri_item_recover(
}
error = xfs_defer_ops_capture_and_commit(tp, capture_list);
out_unlock:
if (attr->xattri_leaf_bp) {
xfs_buf_relse(attr->xattri_leaf_bp);
attr->xattri_leaf_bp = NULL;
}
xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
xfs_irele(ip);
out:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment