Commit e58edaa4 authored by Talat Batheesh's avatar Talat Batheesh Committed by David S. Miller

net/mlx5e: Fix fixpoint divide exception in mlx5e_am_stats_compare

Helmut reported a bug about division by zero while
running traffic and doing physical cable pull test.

When the cable unplugged the ppms become zero, so when
dividing the current ppms by the previous ppms in the
next dim iteration there is division by zero.

This patch prevent this division for both ppms and epms.

Fixes: c3164d2f ("net/mlx5e: Added BW check for DIM decision mechanism")
Reported-by: default avatarHelmut Grauer <helmut.grauer@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTalat Batheesh <talatb@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSaeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent ec835f81
...@@ -201,9 +201,15 @@ static int mlx5e_am_stats_compare(struct mlx5e_rx_am_stats *curr, ...@@ -201,9 +201,15 @@ static int mlx5e_am_stats_compare(struct mlx5e_rx_am_stats *curr,
return (curr->bpms > prev->bpms) ? MLX5E_AM_STATS_BETTER : return (curr->bpms > prev->bpms) ? MLX5E_AM_STATS_BETTER :
MLX5E_AM_STATS_WORSE; MLX5E_AM_STATS_WORSE;
if (!prev->ppms)
return curr->ppms ? MLX5E_AM_STATS_BETTER :
MLX5E_AM_STATS_SAME;
if (IS_SIGNIFICANT_DIFF(curr->ppms, prev->ppms)) if (IS_SIGNIFICANT_DIFF(curr->ppms, prev->ppms))
return (curr->ppms > prev->ppms) ? MLX5E_AM_STATS_BETTER : return (curr->ppms > prev->ppms) ? MLX5E_AM_STATS_BETTER :
MLX5E_AM_STATS_WORSE; MLX5E_AM_STATS_WORSE;
if (!prev->epms)
return MLX5E_AM_STATS_SAME;
if (IS_SIGNIFICANT_DIFF(curr->epms, prev->epms)) if (IS_SIGNIFICANT_DIFF(curr->epms, prev->epms))
return (curr->epms < prev->epms) ? MLX5E_AM_STATS_BETTER : return (curr->epms < prev->epms) ? MLX5E_AM_STATS_BETTER :
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment