Commit edbd7f31 authored by Rob Herring's avatar Rob Herring

drm/shmem: Use mutex_trylock in drm_gem_shmem_purge

Lockdep reports a circular locking dependency with pages_lock taken in
the shrinker callback. The deadlock can't actually happen with current
users at least as a BO will never be purgeable when pages_lock is held.
To be safe, let's use mutex_trylock() instead and bail if a BO is locked
already.

WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.3.0-rc1+ #100 Tainted: G             L
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/171 is trying to acquire lock:
000000009b9823fd (&shmem->pages_lock){+.+.}, at: drm_gem_shmem_purge+0x20/0x40

but task is already holding lock:
00000000f82369b6 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x40

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}:
       fs_reclaim_acquire.part.18+0x34/0x40
       fs_reclaim_acquire+0x20/0x28
       __kmalloc_node+0x6c/0x4c0
       kvmalloc_node+0x38/0xa8
       drm_gem_get_pages+0x80/0x1d0
       drm_gem_shmem_get_pages+0x58/0xa0
       drm_gem_shmem_get_pages_sgt+0x48/0xd0
       panfrost_mmu_map+0x38/0xf8 [panfrost]
       panfrost_gem_open+0xc0/0xe8 [panfrost]
       drm_gem_handle_create_tail+0xe8/0x198
       drm_gem_handle_create+0x3c/0x50
       panfrost_gem_create_with_handle+0x70/0xa0 [panfrost]
       panfrost_ioctl_create_bo+0x48/0x80 [panfrost]
       drm_ioctl_kernel+0xb8/0x110
       drm_ioctl+0x244/0x3f0
       do_vfs_ioctl+0xbc/0x910
       ksys_ioctl+0x78/0xa8
       __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x1c/0x28
       el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x90/0x168
       el0_svc_handler+0x28/0x78
       el0_svc+0x8/0xc

-> #0 (&shmem->pages_lock){+.+.}:
       __lock_acquire+0xa2c/0x1d70
       lock_acquire+0xdc/0x228
       __mutex_lock+0x8c/0x800
       mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x28
       drm_gem_shmem_purge+0x20/0x40
       panfrost_gem_shrinker_scan+0xc0/0x180 [panfrost]
       do_shrink_slab+0x208/0x500
       shrink_slab+0x10c/0x2c0
       shrink_node+0x28c/0x4d8
       balance_pgdat+0x2c8/0x570
       kswapd+0x22c/0x638
       kthread+0x128/0x130
       ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(fs_reclaim);
                               lock(&shmem->pages_lock);
                               lock(fs_reclaim);
  lock(&shmem->pages_lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

3 locks held by kswapd0/171:
 #0: 00000000f82369b6 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x40
 #1: 00000000ceb37808 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}, at: shrink_slab+0xbc/0x2c0
 #2: 00000000f31efa81 (&pfdev->shrinker_lock){+.+.}, at: panfrost_gem_shrinker_scan+0x34/0x180 [panfrost]

Fixes: 17acb9f3 ("drm/shmem: Add madvise state and purge helpers")
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarSteven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Acked-by: default avatarAlyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190823021216.5862-6-robh@kernel.org
parent fe20d1cc
...@@ -415,13 +415,16 @@ void drm_gem_shmem_purge_locked(struct drm_gem_object *obj) ...@@ -415,13 +415,16 @@ void drm_gem_shmem_purge_locked(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
} }
EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_shmem_purge_locked); EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_shmem_purge_locked);
void drm_gem_shmem_purge(struct drm_gem_object *obj) bool drm_gem_shmem_purge(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
{ {
struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem = to_drm_gem_shmem_obj(obj); struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem = to_drm_gem_shmem_obj(obj);
mutex_lock(&shmem->pages_lock); if (!mutex_trylock(&shmem->pages_lock))
return false;
drm_gem_shmem_purge_locked(obj); drm_gem_shmem_purge_locked(obj);
mutex_unlock(&shmem->pages_lock); mutex_unlock(&shmem->pages_lock);
return true;
} }
EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_shmem_purge); EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_shmem_purge);
......
...@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static inline bool drm_gem_shmem_is_purgeable(struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem ...@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static inline bool drm_gem_shmem_is_purgeable(struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem
} }
void drm_gem_shmem_purge_locked(struct drm_gem_object *obj); void drm_gem_shmem_purge_locked(struct drm_gem_object *obj);
void drm_gem_shmem_purge(struct drm_gem_object *obj); bool drm_gem_shmem_purge(struct drm_gem_object *obj);
struct drm_gem_shmem_object * struct drm_gem_shmem_object *
drm_gem_shmem_create_with_handle(struct drm_file *file_priv, drm_gem_shmem_create_with_handle(struct drm_file *file_priv,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment