Commit eed3ecc9 authored by Yu Kuai's avatar Yu Kuai Committed by Jens Axboe

block, bfq: do not idle if only one group is activated

Now that root group is counted into 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs',
'num_groups_with_pending_reqs > 0' is always true in
bfq_asymmetric_scenario(). Thus change the condition to '> 1'.

On the other hand, this change can enable concurrent sync io if only
one group is activated.
Signed-off-by: default avatarYu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Acked-by: default avatarPaolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220916071942.214222-5-yukuai1@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent 71f8ca77
......@@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ bfq_pos_tree_add_move(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
* much easier to maintain the needed state:
* 1) all active queues have the same weight,
* 2) all active queues belong to the same I/O-priority class,
* 3) there are no active groups.
* 3) there is at most one active group.
* In particular, the last condition is always true if hierarchical
* support or the cgroups interface are not enabled, thus no state
* needs to be maintained in this case.
......@@ -852,7 +852,7 @@ static bool bfq_asymmetric_scenario(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
return varied_queue_weights || multiple_classes_busy
#ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
|| bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs > 0
|| bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs > 1
#endif
;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment