Commit f11135a3 authored by Gerrit Renker's avatar Gerrit Renker Committed by David S. Miller

[DCCP]: Dedicated auxiliary states to support passive-close

This adds two auxiliary states to deal with passive closes:
  * PASSIVE_CLOSE    (reached from OPEN via reception of Close)    and
  * PASSIVE_CLOSEREQ (reached from OPEN via reception of CloseReq)
as internal intermediate states.

These states are used to allow a receiver to process unread data before
acknowledging the received connection-termination-request (the Close/CloseReq).

Without such support, it will happen that passively-closed sockets enter CLOSED
state while there is still unprocessed data in the queue; leading to unexpected
and erratic API behaviour.

PASSIVE_CLOSE has been mapped into TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT, so that the code will
seamlessly work with inet_accept() (which tests for this state).

The state names are thanks to Arnaldo, who suggested this naming scheme
following an earlier revision of this patch.
Signed-off-by: default avatarGerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent f53dc67c
......@@ -231,14 +231,35 @@ enum dccp_state {
DCCP_REQUESTING = TCP_SYN_SENT,
DCCP_LISTEN = TCP_LISTEN,
DCCP_RESPOND = TCP_SYN_RECV,
/*
* States involved in closing a DCCP connection:
* 1) ACTIVE_CLOSEREQ is entered by a server sending a CloseReq.
*
* 2) CLOSING can have three different meanings (RFC 4340, 8.3):
* a. Client has performed active-close, has sent a Close to the server
* from state OPEN or PARTOPEN, and is waiting for the final Reset
* (in this case, SOCK_DONE == 1).
* b. Client is asked to perform passive-close, by receiving a CloseReq
* in (PART)OPEN state. It sends a Close and waits for final Reset
* (in this case, SOCK_DONE == 0).
* c. Server performs an active-close as in (a), keeps TIMEWAIT state.
*
* 3) The following intermediate states are employed to give passively
* closing nodes a chance to process their unread data:
* - PASSIVE_CLOSE (from OPEN => CLOSED) and
* - PASSIVE_CLOSEREQ (from (PART)OPEN to CLOSING; case (b) above).
*/
DCCP_ACTIVE_CLOSEREQ = TCP_FIN_WAIT1,
DCCP_PASSIVE_CLOSE = TCP_CLOSE_WAIT, /* any node receiving a Close */
DCCP_CLOSING = TCP_CLOSING,
DCCP_TIME_WAIT = TCP_TIME_WAIT,
DCCP_CLOSED = TCP_CLOSE,
DCCP_PARTOPEN = TCP_MAX_STATES,
DCCP_PASSIVE_CLOSEREQ, /* clients receiving CloseReq */
DCCP_MAX_STATES
};
#define DCCP_STATE_MASK 0xf
#define DCCP_STATE_MASK 0x1f
#define DCCP_ACTION_FIN (1<<7)
enum {
......@@ -246,10 +267,11 @@ enum {
DCCPF_REQUESTING = TCPF_SYN_SENT,
DCCPF_LISTEN = TCPF_LISTEN,
DCCPF_RESPOND = TCPF_SYN_RECV,
DCCPF_ACTIVE_CLOSEREQ = TCPF_FIN_WAIT1,
DCCPF_CLOSING = TCPF_CLOSING,
DCCPF_TIME_WAIT = TCPF_TIME_WAIT,
DCCPF_CLOSED = TCPF_CLOSE,
DCCPF_PARTOPEN = 1 << DCCP_PARTOPEN,
DCCPF_PARTOPEN = (1 << DCCP_PARTOPEN),
};
static inline struct dccp_hdr *dccp_hdr(const struct sk_buff *skb)
......
......@@ -60,8 +60,7 @@ void dccp_set_state(struct sock *sk, const int state)
{
const int oldstate = sk->sk_state;
dccp_pr_debug("%s(%p) %-10.10s -> %s\n",
dccp_role(sk), sk,
dccp_pr_debug("%s(%p) %s --> %s\n", dccp_role(sk), sk,
dccp_state_name(oldstate), dccp_state_name(state));
WARN_ON(state == oldstate);
......@@ -140,6 +139,9 @@ const char *dccp_state_name(const int state)
[DCCP_LISTEN] = "LISTEN",
[DCCP_RESPOND] = "RESPOND",
[DCCP_CLOSING] = "CLOSING",
[DCCP_ACTIVE_CLOSEREQ] = "CLOSEREQ",
[DCCP_PASSIVE_CLOSE] = "PASSIVE_CLOSE",
[DCCP_PASSIVE_CLOSEREQ] = "PASSIVE_CLOSEREQ",
[DCCP_TIME_WAIT] = "TIME_WAIT",
[DCCP_CLOSED] = "CLOSED",
};
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment